Science
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Since the covid hoax every time I hear the word "Science" I immediately turn off. I have completely lost trust in anything Science. I can only think of Tony Fauci "I AM SCIENCE" statement and for claiming he NEVER played down theory that Covid-19 came from a lab. When I think of that, I feel like throwing up.
Science has become a religion with people proclaiming they "believe in it ". Who cares who funds it, or what insane conflicts of interest they have. Or if they cheated in any of the trials, or if the studies that showed no benefit simply disappeared into the ether ...
a) RELIGION, noun (Latin religo, to bind anew) represents ones consent to the suggestion (scientism) of anther, hence binding oneself by consent to those suggesting.
b) suggested scientism tempts one to ignore perceivable SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
c) suggested "become" tempts one to ignore that one already "came to be"...otherwise one wouldn't be.
a) to believe or disbelieve represents ones consent to the suggestions by another.
b) those who suggest gain possession over those who consent, while those who consent are tricked to believe that they can claim the suggested, which will always be taken from them.
a) foundation (inception towards death) demands those within (life) to care for self or perish...
b) consenting to the suggestions of others tempts one to view them as the foundation, which gives others the power to conceal the foundation by piling more suggestions upon it.
a) the few suggested words (fiction) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound (reality).
Suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (being within sound) and "per sonos" (being by sound).
b) consenting to want or not want suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, tempts one into a want versus not want conflict called "reasoning". The few utilize suggestion (-isms) to divide the consenting many to reason against each other over the suggested, which gives the few not only control over both sides of every conflict, but also the mass consent required to be able to define (idolatry), redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will, while the many can only reasoning against each other about what it means.
Living implies within the process of dying aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka form within flow aka material within immaterial.
E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Gr. to burn, to shine.]...living within the process of dying represents a burned offering (holocaust) and a light-bearer.
Sleight of hand: "this little light of mine...I'm gonna let it shine"