Umm. Military use civilian assets all the time and they can even roster them into service, seizing assets. Who knows who cares? They are contracted and funded to extents and clauses within the Ukraine. Why is it a conspiracy? When in fact it is providing coverage in active war zone. A war zone subjected to jammers and communication outages where sat phones and uplinks provide another means of communication as lines and power grids are disrupted. But does it make any satellites a target?
Besides the conspiracy is although it was privately developed for remote access, in most locations covered, who are its main contractors? Think you'll find military and other branches of government had been using it more? Outside of bigger corporations.
Umm. Military use civilian assets all the time and they can even roster them into service, seizing assets. Who knows who cares? They are contracted and funded to extents and clauses within the Ukraine. Why is it a conspiracy? When in fact it is providing coverage in active war zone. A war zone subjected to jammers and communication outages where sat phones and uplinks provide another means of communication as lines and power grids are disrupted. But does it make any satellites a target?
Besides the conspiracy is although it was privately developed for remote access, in most locations covered, who are its main contractors? Think you'll find military and other branches of government had been using it more? Outside of bigger corporations.