They are hazardous like almost every other munition used producing contamination and toxicity.
The fact is why are Ukrainians getting the best munitions. They cannot produce them. They effectively require nuclear capability. Depleted uranium is produced how, off prior enrichment and cores and scientific know how.
There are little defenses to these rounds and they don't just need tanks firing them. Used in sniper rifles. They literally pierce through most defenses, armour, and walls. Burning holes right through it. If you get hit by them you're quite dead. The contamination on impact also kills, producing a dust or vapor, until dissipation, like on almost every bomb or explosion. Except not much study on trace and ground tables, except readings of any traces where these slugs and shells have been used. But often those same readings and science will tell the type of munition blowing up most buildings and impacts. Are there concerns, sure. However it's war. Little health and safety. How does that work.
The debate becomes how a non nuclear enemy has those rounds. It then causes a reaction to them. Not whether they're propaganda. Because the propaganda could sooner read all out war.
This becomes a bigger concern as more and more stuff gets given to the Ukraine. Jets now, long-range missiles, drones, modern tanks, artillery systems. Etc etc.
At what point does a supposedly superior enemy not use its full arsenal?
Numbers get scary, Russia could have endless soldiers, far more, so much bigger population, millions. If China and others start production for it, when does this end? There's only escalation. Until any arsenal uses all of its capability. Ukraine is. It's getting endless funding and endless resupply of arms from everyone else. What stops it? Only bigger guns, right? The same is assumed against. So the anti keeps rising.
So who is fighting that war? Ukraine or the uranium depleted slugs, Nato, who?
Hence the increasing escalation. Or the threat of all out war.
Whether you realise it or not. It's like any other game where the stakes keep getting higher, because there's all to play for. Which folds, the pot keeps raising, they're both committed, and going all in. What wins it?
Ukraine cannot manufacture that ammunition. So when it's armed with high piercing rounds, some of the best marketable, there aren't many others, and faster everything else, how does an opponent react to the contunued threat? They raise the stakes. Bigger guns. Or wider impact. Matching, right. Or overkill. Until you tell me how it resolves?
The same argument can be applied to Ukraine. If Nato stopped arming Ukraine the war would be over tomorrow. If Ukraine sat down with a peace deal, the war would be over tomorrow.
What is Ukraine, a country and border drawn exclusively by Russia. Any other claim is ignorant of history. Ukraine is a nation because of Russia. Not because it ever existed outside of that fact unless we go back thousands of years ago to the Roman Empire. It has had no other border since except Russian and Ottoman historically. All of its border has been Russian, until Nato armed it.
At what point are Russia an invader? Because some dumb map calls Russian territory Nato? Hahaha. In doing so this war will only escalate.
Any Russian army will have added millions into it, if it needs them. Ukraine cannot win without a larger war against Russia. Russia can always win if it nukes Ukraine. Geopolitically Ukraine will not win, explain it beating Russia without a larger war, but Russia can lose if a larger war occurs. In the meantime how many pawns are left on the board. There are still millions. As far as full on war productivity. How long do taxes keep paying for it. In the meantime escalation rears.
No I am not Russian, and I am sure as shit not Ukrainian. I don't care for it. Unless my nation is actually deployed by voted record. Then it's fuck Russia. But until then I don't care what Ukraine isn't. Because it isn't what it claims it is. It still has to beat Russia and those are odds are almost 0 without a larger war occurring where my nation is actually fighting. Slightly factored by regime change and global disaster. Tiny. If it doesn't win it will have concede recognising Russia. So there is no peace. Who honestly wanted it?
Silly topic is silly.
They are hazardous like almost every other munition used producing contamination and toxicity.
The fact is why are Ukrainians getting the best munitions. They cannot produce them. They effectively require nuclear capability. Depleted uranium is produced how, off prior enrichment and cores and scientific know how.
There are little defenses to these rounds and they don't just need tanks firing them. Used in sniper rifles. They literally pierce through most defenses, armour, and walls. Burning holes right through it. If you get hit by them you're quite dead. The contamination on impact also kills, producing a dust or vapor, until dissipation, like on almost every bomb or explosion. Except not much study on trace and ground tables, except readings of any traces where these slugs and shells have been used. But often those same readings and science will tell the type of munition blowing up most buildings and impacts. Are there concerns, sure. However it's war. Little health and safety. How does that work.
The debate becomes how a non nuclear enemy has those rounds. It then causes a reaction to them. Not whether they're propaganda. Because the propaganda could sooner read all out war.
This becomes a bigger concern as more and more stuff gets given to the Ukraine. Jets now, long-range missiles, drones, modern tanks, artillery systems. Etc etc.
At what point does a supposedly superior enemy not use its full arsenal?
Numbers get scary, Russia could have endless soldiers, far more, so much bigger population, millions. If China and others start production for it, when does this end? There's only escalation. Until any arsenal uses all of its capability. Ukraine is. It's getting endless funding and endless resupply of arms from everyone else. What stops it? Only bigger guns, right? The same is assumed against. So the anti keeps rising.
To fuck up the Russkie invaders.
So who is fighting that war? Ukraine or the uranium depleted slugs, Nato, who?
Hence the increasing escalation. Or the threat of all out war.
Whether you realise it or not. It's like any other game where the stakes keep getting higher, because there's all to play for. Which folds, the pot keeps raising, they're both committed, and going all in. What wins it?
Ukraine cannot manufacture that ammunition. So when it's armed with high piercing rounds, some of the best marketable, there aren't many others, and faster everything else, how does an opponent react to the contunued threat? They raise the stakes. Bigger guns. Or wider impact. Matching, right. Or overkill. Until you tell me how it resolves?
Ukraine is fighting with the help of NATO and other nations.
The war can be over today if Putin decided to end the invasion and leave Ukraine alone.
Are you nuts. Like literally autistic.
The same argument can be applied to Ukraine. If Nato stopped arming Ukraine the war would be over tomorrow. If Ukraine sat down with a peace deal, the war would be over tomorrow.
What is Ukraine, a country and border drawn exclusively by Russia. Any other claim is ignorant of history. Ukraine is a nation because of Russia. Not because it ever existed outside of that fact unless we go back thousands of years ago to the Roman Empire. It has had no other border since except Russian and Ottoman historically. All of its border has been Russian, until Nato armed it.
At what point are Russia an invader? Because some dumb map calls Russian territory Nato? Hahaha. In doing so this war will only escalate.
Any Russian army will have added millions into it, if it needs them. Ukraine cannot win without a larger war against Russia. Russia can always win if it nukes Ukraine. Geopolitically Ukraine will not win, explain it beating Russia without a larger war, but Russia can lose if a larger war occurs. In the meantime how many pawns are left on the board. There are still millions. As far as full on war productivity. How long do taxes keep paying for it. In the meantime escalation rears.
No I am not Russian, and I am sure as shit not Ukrainian. I don't care for it. Unless my nation is actually deployed by voted record. Then it's fuck Russia. But until then I don't care what Ukraine isn't. Because it isn't what it claims it is. It still has to beat Russia and those are odds are almost 0 without a larger war occurring where my nation is actually fighting. Slightly factored by regime change and global disaster. Tiny. If it doesn't win it will have concede recognising Russia. So there is no peace. Who honestly wanted it?