So who is fighting that war? Ukraine or the uranium depleted slugs, Nato, who?
Hence the increasing escalation. Or the threat of all out war.
Whether you realise it or not. It's like any other game where the stakes keep getting higher, because there's all to play for. Which folds, the pot keeps raising, they're both committed, and going all in. What wins it?
Ukraine cannot manufacture that ammunition. So when it's armed with high piercing rounds, some of the best marketable, there aren't many others, and faster everything else, how does an opponent react to the contunued threat? They raise the stakes. Bigger guns. Or wider impact. Matching, right. Or overkill. Until you tell me how it resolves?
The same argument can be applied to Ukraine. If Nato stopped arming Ukraine the war would be over tomorrow. If Ukraine sat down with a peace deal, the war would be over tomorrow.
What is Ukraine, a country and border drawn exclusively by Russia. Any other claim is ignorant of history. Ukraine is a nation because of Russia. Not because it ever existed outside of that fact unless we go back thousands of years ago to the Roman Empire. It has had no other border since except Russian and Ottoman historically. All of its border has been Russian, until Nato armed it.
At what point are Russia an invader? Because some dumb map calls Russian territory Nato? Hahaha. In doing so this war will only escalate.
Any Russian army will have added millions into it, if it needs them. Ukraine cannot win without a larger war against Russia. Russia can always win if it nukes Ukraine. Geopolitically Ukraine will not win, explain it beating Russia without a larger war, but Russia can lose if a larger war occurs. In the meantime how many pawns are left on the board. There are still millions. As far as full on war productivity. How long do taxes keep paying for it. In the meantime escalation rears.
No I am not Russian, and I am sure as shit not Ukrainian. I don't care for it. Unless my nation is actually deployed by voted record. Then it's fuck Russia. But until then I don't care what Ukraine isn't. Because it isn't what it claims it is. It still has to beat Russia and those are odds are almost 0 without a larger war occurring where my nation is actually fighting. Slightly factored by regime change and global disaster. Tiny. If it doesn't win it will have concede recognising Russia. So there is no peace. Who honestly wanted it?
Are you retarded. Victim. No. Aggressor. Agitator. Instigator.
It had been ever since it couped. It was an instigator. An insurgent.
There are no naive little victims in this. Only traitors and cattle. Cattle think minefield has nicer grass in it. Traitors pick up gun killing their own families. Only Judas in the Ukraine, and those learning there's no such thing as nicer grass in minefields. Victims of their own treachery. Exploding sheep, Judas put bombs in their coats.
Who invaded what? Putting NATO naval bases on the coastline a few km from a Russian nuclear base isn't going to cause war? NATO Biolabs on the Border. Arming with increasing Nato guns. Causing increasing activity against sovereign Russian soil. The Crimea.
As soon as they couped the Crimea was sanctioned. Are you nuts. Showing their hearts were poison. Blackened poison hearts seeking war. Not peace, unity, truth, brotherhood. Poison, and war. It would only become it. Never treaty.
Lastly I don't care I find it ironic. No I'm not a Russian, but I hate backstabbers more. There are ways to doing things to make peace, and Ukraine is not a good example of it. It's a toxic nation dividing its own.
There are no little narratives whatsoever. There is only history. Action reaction meeting causality. It was always going to be war. But you're still in denial. Make peace then?
I am under no deception here. If want war go to war, but don't pretend to have sheep do your bidding. I'd support a war I was fighting. Never a traitor. Never stupid little obnoxious narratives of victims, unless they're born this. There's only choices and the consequences of them.
So who is fighting that war? Ukraine or the uranium depleted slugs, Nato, who?
Hence the increasing escalation. Or the threat of all out war.
Whether you realise it or not. It's like any other game where the stakes keep getting higher, because there's all to play for. Which folds, the pot keeps raising, they're both committed, and going all in. What wins it?
Ukraine cannot manufacture that ammunition. So when it's armed with high piercing rounds, some of the best marketable, there aren't many others, and faster everything else, how does an opponent react to the contunued threat? They raise the stakes. Bigger guns. Or wider impact. Matching, right. Or overkill. Until you tell me how it resolves?
Ukraine is fighting with the help of NATO and other nations.
The war can be over today if Putin decided to end the invasion and leave Ukraine alone.
Are you nuts. Like literally autistic.
The same argument can be applied to Ukraine. If Nato stopped arming Ukraine the war would be over tomorrow. If Ukraine sat down with a peace deal, the war would be over tomorrow.
What is Ukraine, a country and border drawn exclusively by Russia. Any other claim is ignorant of history. Ukraine is a nation because of Russia. Not because it ever existed outside of that fact unless we go back thousands of years ago to the Roman Empire. It has had no other border since except Russian and Ottoman historically. All of its border has been Russian, until Nato armed it.
At what point are Russia an invader? Because some dumb map calls Russian territory Nato? Hahaha. In doing so this war will only escalate.
Any Russian army will have added millions into it, if it needs them. Ukraine cannot win without a larger war against Russia. Russia can always win if it nukes Ukraine. Geopolitically Ukraine will not win, explain it beating Russia without a larger war, but Russia can lose if a larger war occurs. In the meantime how many pawns are left on the board. There are still millions. As far as full on war productivity. How long do taxes keep paying for it. In the meantime escalation rears.
No I am not Russian, and I am sure as shit not Ukrainian. I don't care for it. Unless my nation is actually deployed by voted record. Then it's fuck Russia. But until then I don't care what Ukraine isn't. Because it isn't what it claims it is. It still has to beat Russia and those are odds are almost 0 without a larger war occurring where my nation is actually fighting. Slightly factored by regime change and global disaster. Tiny. If it doesn't win it will have concede recognising Russia. So there is no peace. Who honestly wanted it?
So you want Ukraine to roll over and surrender. Disgusting
You are arguing that it's the victim's fault if they defend themselves against an aggressor.
When they invade another country.
Are you fucking insane? Ukraine isn't a NATO member.
Then why do you suck Putin's dick so much? Because it tastes so good?
Are you retarded. Victim. No. Aggressor. Agitator. Instigator.
It had been ever since it couped. It was an instigator. An insurgent.
There are no naive little victims in this. Only traitors and cattle. Cattle think minefield has nicer grass in it. Traitors pick up gun killing their own families. Only Judas in the Ukraine, and those learning there's no such thing as nicer grass in minefields. Victims of their own treachery. Exploding sheep, Judas put bombs in their coats.
Who invaded what? Putting NATO naval bases on the coastline a few km from a Russian nuclear base isn't going to cause war? NATO Biolabs on the Border. Arming with increasing Nato guns. Causing increasing activity against sovereign Russian soil. The Crimea.
As soon as they couped the Crimea was sanctioned. Are you nuts. Showing their hearts were poison. Blackened poison hearts seeking war. Not peace, unity, truth, brotherhood. Poison, and war. It would only become it. Never treaty.
Lastly I don't care I find it ironic. No I'm not a Russian, but I hate backstabbers more. There are ways to doing things to make peace, and Ukraine is not a good example of it. It's a toxic nation dividing its own.
There are no little narratives whatsoever. There is only history. Action reaction meeting causality. It was always going to be war. But you're still in denial. Make peace then?
I am under no deception here. If want war go to war, but don't pretend to have sheep do your bidding. I'd support a war I was fighting. Never a traitor. Never stupid little obnoxious narratives of victims, unless they're born this. There's only choices and the consequences of them.