Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

73
"Fossil fuels" (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by DOI56 2 years ago by DOI56 +75 / -2
29 comments share
29 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– RedPill78 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

lack of understanding

we shut in wells, if they are not making money. we are forced, by regulatory agencies, to plug wells after a certain time of inactivity. why would we try to displace the time to plug a well? it comes down to economics.

wells/land/ownership, in the US, are leased from private/federal owners. generic law is that as long as it produces (at economic quantities), the lease is held under the original documents. if it is uneconomic, the lease becomes invalid. the lease is released. think PUGH clause. so one well, containing a lease acreage greater than attributed to one well, can maintain a lease. i can produce a well for a couple barrels a month to keep a lease that maintains a lease of 40 acres, or 320 acres. depends on how the original documents were drafted. no conspiracy, just business and evolution of contract law. remember that lawyers were drafting lease documents from the seat of their pants 100 years ago.

wells tend to produce, initially, by depletion drive. not all. there are other drive mechanisms. this affects what the expectations on recovery is.

if you only recover 10% of the original oil in place (OOIP) through depletion drive, why would you spend a bunch of money if there are potentially ways of recovering additional oil? economics. and yes 10% is a reasonable expectation globally average for depletion drive reservoirs. look it up. it's greater for a water drive.

that's what i do. what is the recovery? what can we do to increase the recovery? is there meat left on the bone. there are many different methods to enhance recovery, but they are cost-intensive.

it's not deception, really. it's a misunderstanding of what is possible, economically.

let's talk about 2 key concepts. 1; what is available original oil in place (OOIP) and 2; what rate can it be delivered (Darcy). this drives what is known as rate of return (ROR) and expected ultimate recovery (EUR). two vastly different calculations, based on a time function, due to the time value of money (cost of capital).

So...when the pressure has been drawn off of the reservoir, and deliverability is reduced, what is left. How can we get it?

We do that through secondary and tertiary recovery. These are know as waterflooding and CO2 flooding. others are polymer and surfactant polymer flooding. There are others.

So, if you have a well that comes in at a certain rate, it will decline as the resource is drained. At some point, it will decline to a point where it is uneconomic to operate and make money. Then, we evaluate whether or not we can manipulate the rock to recover more oil/gas from the rock. This is driven by economics.

https://wiki.aapg.org/Reserves_estimation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darcy's_law

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Redlegs 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Thanks for taking the time to write the detail you have put into this thread Redpill78 I am very grateful for the insight

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Fed-intern420 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Don’t forget fossil fuels also is created by one of the largest biomasses on earth, fungal mycelium. It also enhances the breakdown of other organic matter into oil or gas under pressure

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RedPill78 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

i think what you are referring to is termed biogenic gas.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - gfttc (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy