High altitude balloons can carry EMPs
(youtu.be)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
And that’s fucking meaningless, because they will never attack the crux of their own power.
Balloon versus satellite. Which is cheaper? Supposing your Emp is powerful enough.
What about planes, and drones.
However what's the EMP targeting, and what's its radius?
These tend to be nuclear based weapons. Designed specifically for knocking out satellites in upper orbit. Bigger blast radius creating a bigger pulse. There are developments from this, non nuclear, but they have much smaller radiuses, and perhaps can target releasing a beam like pulse weapon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse
It doesn’t matter, because they won’t ever use an EMP. It would destroy their power and allow us to slaughter them all.
No read the wiki. You won't even detect them. Directed energy based weapons, capable of rendering electronics useless. Problem is the range. These fire a beam. There are a few types. Interesting reads.
Nuclear based EMPS, where there is a number of warheads, and there are even specific sat killer missiles. These in all probability are launched first, if we went into first strike and nuclear war. The first targets are those satellites and space. Why. Detection, coms, and the grid. If you're launching reentry vehicles ICBMs from mobile launchers you want detection, GPS, and spy satellites kaput.
I don’t care if they can be detected. They will not be used. The ZOG only has power over us because of the electrical grids they will not take out their own base of power.
READ the wiki. Directed energy based weapons. Types.
Read the wiki on EMPs. The traditional EMP prior to directed energy weapons was based off nukes.
Stop telling me what you think you know.
Okay. I don’t give a shit. They. Will. Not. Use. Weapons. That. Revoke. Their. Power.
Nonsense. Who are they.
What is any potential weapon being used for. Drone, satellite, plane, warhead, grid, etc.
How much is it worth. Let's suggest you knock out a plane. Shares tank. You had knowledge of this and a solution of an alternative airline. What about an assassination. Or what about a critical infrastructure power outage. Or a train derailment. What about a satellite. Hell you could rig huge profit from any chaos.
But we are talking war. Powerstations tend to be more shielded especially nuclear power stations, unless direct strikes. Not as easily shutdown. But there are hacks and other electronic warfare causing disruptions apart from the supposed EMP.
However if it went there and you don't want your reentry vehicles detected those ICBM's and mobile launchers of course you're going to knock out enemy coms, and satellites, and disrupt the grid.
You're making spurious remarks. Literal absurdity. What happened to the recent pipeline. War easiest target. Profit they've made multi billions in the shortfall.
I am not saying that was on that balloon. I don't know what was. But it's becoming a possibility.
Operation Hardtack- 1959.
Gosh, I guess you want me to be scared