I've dug into this theory a little bit, but it is hard to believe any source these days. For example, terrain theory states that the viruses found via isolation are nothing more than exosomes being misidentified. They also show experiments conducted throughout the early 20th century where scientists could not prove transmission from a sick person to a healthy person, with many attempts.
I can sort of get behind their disproving viruses, but the alternative they present hasn't been realistic, in my experience. I'm currently sick with the nastiest flu I've had since I was a kid. Apparently, I picked it up when I visited my parents. My dad was sick the day after I left. I didn't get any symptoms until 4 days later. My mom, who lives with him, didn't get it until 5 days later. My wife got it 3 days after I got home.
So there seems to be something more than toxins in the local environment causing transmission. If I had been exposed to a toxin while visiting my parents 200 miles away, it shouldn't have affected my wife, whom I haven't been in close contact with since returning home. Nevertheless, she still became sick with the same symptoms.
I was almost on board with terrain theory. My wife usually never gets sick, no matter how many times my son and I get sick. However, there is clearly some kind of transmissible substance being shared since she is also sick this time.
I'm sure there are many other possibilities that could coincidentally result in her sick with the same symptoms within that timeline, but I'm doubtful they are convincing. There is clearly something being passed around, and I would love to know what it really is.
I think you need to undergo a 'paradigm shift' before any of this makes sense. Your first paragraph is really the key point -- transmission from sick to healthy individuals has never been proven, despite many attempts. Therefore the 'virus' model is clearly, unambiguously false. And vaccines are simply a religious tool.
Ah -- but your wife got sick! True! That's happened to me, too, and to everybody. So (a) scientific experiment shows no transmission; (b) your lived experience 'indicates' transmission.
Consider: I've found the bodies of two suicides in my life. One was a friend of a friend, she shot herself in her car. I shook my head, called the police and went on with my life. The other was one of my best friend -- I screamed uncontrollably for 6 hours. My voice gave out, but I kept screaming. But, you see, both situations are physically the same -- a dead body. So why the wildly disparate responses? Well -- the emotional connection.
So why did your wife get sick -- because she saw you sick, and her body decided that it was time to get sick. Why didn't she get sick the other times? Better genetics/diet/health/lifestyle (etc) than you. So the idea here is that (a) people get sick because sometimes the body needs to expel something; (b) if your wife sees you, her body might decide that she should do that too. What things need to be expelled... well, toxins, okay, but also -- you're constantly breathing in dust and sand and smoke. It builds up, and needs to be flushed out from time to time.
This explanation isn't really satisfying to modern 'scientific' people. But remember, 'science' is only lauded because physics and chemistry are so very successful. But the scientific model is really only applicable to those and a handful of other disciplines.
Makes me wonder if events like these are where these sudden outbreaks come from. Inhaling the wrong amount of invisible toxins. Concentrations would vary greatly depending on wind patterns, so several people could be affected severely while others barely notice it.
Yeah, one thing they don't mention is that Lombardy, the place in Italy where the Coronavirus hit first outside China, is the most polluted region of Europe.
Also, when you hear about Swine Flu (2009) or Bird Flu (2023) -- look into the conditions that the animals are kept in. No wonder they're getting sick! They only call them 'flus' because it's a convenient way to keep people frightened of 'viruses'.
I've dug into this theory a little bit, but it is hard to believe any source these days. For example, terrain theory states that the viruses found via isolation are nothing more than exosomes being misidentified. They also show experiments conducted throughout the early 20th century where scientists could not prove transmission from a sick person to a healthy person, with many attempts.
I can sort of get behind their disproving viruses, but the alternative they present hasn't been realistic, in my experience. I'm currently sick with the nastiest flu I've had since I was a kid. Apparently, I picked it up when I visited my parents. My dad was sick the day after I left. I didn't get any symptoms until 4 days later. My mom, who lives with him, didn't get it until 5 days later. My wife got it 3 days after I got home.
So there seems to be something more than toxins in the local environment causing transmission. If I had been exposed to a toxin while visiting my parents 200 miles away, it shouldn't have affected my wife, whom I haven't been in close contact with since returning home. Nevertheless, she still became sick with the same symptoms.
I was almost on board with terrain theory. My wife usually never gets sick, no matter how many times my son and I get sick. However, there is clearly some kind of transmissible substance being shared since she is also sick this time.
I'm sure there are many other possibilities that could coincidentally result in her sick with the same symptoms within that timeline, but I'm doubtful they are convincing. There is clearly something being passed around, and I would love to know what it really is.
no-cebo placebo effect. be careful, laughing and yawning are "contagious" too
That's a damn good example.
I think you need to undergo a 'paradigm shift' before any of this makes sense. Your first paragraph is really the key point -- transmission from sick to healthy individuals has never been proven, despite many attempts. Therefore the 'virus' model is clearly, unambiguously false. And vaccines are simply a religious tool.
Ah -- but your wife got sick! True! That's happened to me, too, and to everybody. So (a) scientific experiment shows no transmission; (b) your lived experience 'indicates' transmission.
Consider: I've found the bodies of two suicides in my life. One was a friend of a friend, she shot herself in her car. I shook my head, called the police and went on with my life. The other was one of my best friend -- I screamed uncontrollably for 6 hours. My voice gave out, but I kept screaming. But, you see, both situations are physically the same -- a dead body. So why the wildly disparate responses? Well -- the emotional connection.
So why did your wife get sick -- because she saw you sick, and her body decided that it was time to get sick. Why didn't she get sick the other times? Better genetics/diet/health/lifestyle (etc) than you. So the idea here is that (a) people get sick because sometimes the body needs to expel something; (b) if your wife sees you, her body might decide that she should do that too. What things need to be expelled... well, toxins, okay, but also -- you're constantly breathing in dust and sand and smoke. It builds up, and needs to be flushed out from time to time.
This explanation isn't really satisfying to modern 'scientific' people. But remember, 'science' is only lauded because physics and chemistry are so very successful. But the scientific model is really only applicable to those and a handful of other disciplines.
Makes me wonder if events like these are where these sudden outbreaks come from. Inhaling the wrong amount of invisible toxins. Concentrations would vary greatly depending on wind patterns, so several people could be affected severely while others barely notice it.
Yeah, one thing they don't mention is that Lombardy, the place in Italy where the Coronavirus hit first outside China, is the most polluted region of Europe.
Also, when you hear about Swine Flu (2009) or Bird Flu (2023) -- look into the conditions that the animals are kept in. No wonder they're getting sick! They only call them 'flus' because it's a convenient way to keep people frightened of 'viruses'.