It's extremely noticeable in the 'southern hemisphere'. Of course on a FE map it would be more accurate to describe the southern hemisphere as the outer hemisphere, and the north would be the inner hemisphere with the equator dividing the two. Try booking flights between South America and Australia. They are much further apart in the FE reality than on the globe model. The best example is Perth to Buenos Aires. The shortest route on the globe would be a 7800 mile flight over the south pole. In reality you will only find flights with several connections that go through north America or something.
My pount is that is deterministically provable. Where specificially did globe earthers get it wrong? What "area" of earth is distorted in reality? And what is the deterministically calculated sq miles of area that is distorted?
Again. Deterministic. So proof should be easy.
Yet, that proof is nowhere, thus, flat earth theory is false. QED
How would you physically measure the distances between landmasses or continents? You can only take boats or planes, but those travel through mediums that move (air/water) so speed, distance, time calculations would be altered by these elements. Really there is only one why we physically measure these distances between landmasses, with communication cables that are laid across the ocean. Look at how they are laid between continents on a globe vs a flat earth map. Which one do they make more sense on? Why aren't there any cables between South America and Australia?
Also if we can book any flights between South America an Australia (that fly as near as possible to the south pole) I think that would prove to any flat earther the globe is true. There are rare flights capable of long range that can go direct, but their path goes over the ocean near antartica taking advantage of the southern jet stream for extra speed.
Here is a career land surveyor who talks about how his entire career never once accounted for earth curve. And no matter how many surveys are taken over a city or county, earth curve is never a factor.
Where are the distortions? Flat planes can't be projected onto a sphere without introducing distortion, and vice versa. Basic topological axiom.
It's extremely noticeable in the 'southern hemisphere'. Of course on a FE map it would be more accurate to describe the southern hemisphere as the outer hemisphere, and the north would be the inner hemisphere with the equator dividing the two. Try booking flights between South America and Australia. They are much further apart in the FE reality than on the globe model. The best example is Perth to Buenos Aires. The shortest route on the globe would be a 7800 mile flight over the south pole. In reality you will only find flights with several connections that go through north America or something.
My pount is that is deterministically provable. Where specificially did globe earthers get it wrong? What "area" of earth is distorted in reality? And what is the deterministically calculated sq miles of area that is distorted?
Again. Deterministic. So proof should be easy.
Yet, that proof is nowhere, thus, flat earth theory is false. QED
How would you physically measure the distances between landmasses or continents? You can only take boats or planes, but those travel through mediums that move (air/water) so speed, distance, time calculations would be altered by these elements. Really there is only one why we physically measure these distances between landmasses, with communication cables that are laid across the ocean. Look at how they are laid between continents on a globe vs a flat earth map. Which one do they make more sense on? Why aren't there any cables between South America and Australia?
Also if we can book any flights between South America an Australia (that fly as near as possible to the south pole) I think that would prove to any flat earther the globe is true. There are rare flights capable of long range that can go direct, but their path goes over the ocean near antartica taking advantage of the southern jet stream for extra speed.
Here is a career land surveyor who talks about how his entire career never once accounted for earth curve. And no matter how many surveys are taken over a city or county, earth curve is never a factor.
https://youtu.be/9BSKVE9pp60
Compute the areas speculated under both scenarios. The maps could be rotated to push distortions wherever you want, your locality for example.
This is so retarded, lol.