My pount is that is deterministically provable. Where specificially did globe earthers get it wrong? What "area" of earth is distorted in reality? And what is the deterministically calculated sq miles of area that is distorted?
Again. Deterministic. So proof should be easy.
Yet, that proof is nowhere, thus, flat earth theory is false. QED
How would you physically measure the distances between landmasses or continents? You can only take boats or planes, but those travel through mediums that move (air/water) so speed, distance, time calculations would be altered by these elements. Really there is only one why we physically measure these distances between landmasses, with communication cables that are laid across the ocean. Look at how they are laid between continents on a globe vs a flat earth map. Which one do they make more sense on? Why aren't there any cables between South America and Australia?
Also if we can book any flights between South America an Australia (that fly as near as possible to the south pole) I think that would prove to any flat earther the globe is true. There are rare flights capable of long range that can go direct, but their path goes over the ocean near antartica taking advantage of the southern jet stream for extra speed.
Here is a career land surveyor who talks about how his entire career never once accounted for earth curve. And no matter how many surveys are taken over a city or county, earth curve is never a factor.
If you are referring to the surveyor he talks about independent surveys bordering eachother like a flat puzzle. If you tried bending a jigsaw puzzle over a curved surface you can imagine what would happen. The curve is never an issue.
My pount is that is deterministically provable. Where specificially did globe earthers get it wrong? What "area" of earth is distorted in reality? And what is the deterministically calculated sq miles of area that is distorted?
Again. Deterministic. So proof should be easy.
Yet, that proof is nowhere, thus, flat earth theory is false. QED
How would you physically measure the distances between landmasses or continents? You can only take boats or planes, but those travel through mediums that move (air/water) so speed, distance, time calculations would be altered by these elements. Really there is only one why we physically measure these distances between landmasses, with communication cables that are laid across the ocean. Look at how they are laid between continents on a globe vs a flat earth map. Which one do they make more sense on? Why aren't there any cables between South America and Australia?
Also if we can book any flights between South America an Australia (that fly as near as possible to the south pole) I think that would prove to any flat earther the globe is true. There are rare flights capable of long range that can go direct, but their path goes over the ocean near antartica taking advantage of the southern jet stream for extra speed.
Here is a career land surveyor who talks about how his entire career never once accounted for earth curve. And no matter how many surveys are taken over a city or county, earth curve is never a factor.
https://youtu.be/9BSKVE9pp60
Compute the areas speculated under both scenarios. The maps could be rotated to push distortions wherever you want, your locality for example.
This is so retarded, lol.
If you are referring to the surveyor he talks about independent surveys bordering eachother like a flat puzzle. If you tried bending a jigsaw puzzle over a curved surface you can imagine what would happen. The curve is never an issue.
Okay, obviously you're unable to follow along.