I agree that the footage of a flat horizon, from any altitude, is not “proof” or even particularly compelling evidence for the shape of the entire world.
However, it is good evidence that we were mistaught about what the horizon is and that, supposedly, because it appears to curve at some increasingly (literally, since this myth began to be spread, the altitude required to supposedly see it always increases with public ability to verify/refute it) unattainable altitude - that proves the world is spherical. Both “proofs” are bunk, and for similar reasons.
Does it bother you that you have to fabricate things that i didn’t say because you can’t rationally respond to any of the the things i actually said? It would bother me if i were you ...
In any case, your fabricated “quote” is nonsensical. Math is merely a language. It isn’t fake, but everything written with it isn’t automatically true/real as a result.
I agree that the footage of a flat horizon, from any altitude, is not “proof” or even particularly compelling evidence for the shape of the entire world.
However, it is good evidence that we were mistaught about what the horizon is and that, supposedly, because it appears to curve at some increasingly (literally, since this myth began to be spread, the altitude required to supposedly see it always increases with public ability to verify/refute it) unattainable altitude - that proves the world is spherical. Both “proofs” are bunk, and for similar reasons.
"Math is fake"
Does it bother you that you have to fabricate things that i didn’t say because you can’t rationally respond to any of the the things i actually said? It would bother me if i were you ...
In any case, your fabricated “quote” is nonsensical. Math is merely a language. It isn’t fake, but everything written with it isn’t automatically true/real as a result.