interesting Egypt thread developing on /pol/ (link in comments)
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
I've heard that claim. He doesn't really show characteristics of being jewish.
He's 1% Northern Italian, which he claims is Northern Germanic
2% Eastern European/Russian
47% Germanic Europe / Aryan
His Grandfather was a high ranking SS Officer in German military
50% Persian / Iranian
Robert Sepehr's DNA Results https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBzRqbnoYfU
What's confusing is the video chapter notes shows "Jewish DNA" in place of his 47% Germanic / Aryan lineage. He seems to indicate that some germanic people's spoke Yiddish which is partially hebrew but his DNA didn't contain any?
His videos consistently research swastikas and Aryan history so it is doubtful he's any significant portion a jew.
Okay, that makes much more sense. There are tons of other 'good jews', but they all give off a jewish vibe. Sepehr doesn't give off any such vibe. If anything, he seems like an Aryan God, especially if you've seen the pictures of him when he was young.
Thanks for the info.
I actually see the Iranian in him. And he does seem Germanic. So I think he's telling the truth.
Also, he seems obsessed with researching Aryan history and utilization of the swastika symbol dating back thousands of years. I believe that his research is important because I think, especially in post WWII academia, there was an organized attempt to destroy the history of Aryans and strip them of all achievements and historical importance. This just doesn't seem like something a Jew would dedicate studies to. It seems Sepehr researches this because he is exploring his own ancestral past and is willing to challenge consensus HIS-story in some greater virtuous odyssey for the truth.
Sometimes I watch some of the rebuttals and attack videos against Robert Sepehr. It's always by very beta, angry academic frauds who seem upset that the jew version of HIS-story is being unraveled or challenged. Their rebuttals seem vindictive and emotionally charged whereas Robert Sepehr seems calm and objective and more at ease with sharing his truth voyage rather than protecting the tenets of a deceitful academic body of lies.