If they cannot live up to their purpose, ignore them completely like trash on the sidewalk (actually sometimes I put the trash in the bin) but the government is non-existent.
They are not a thing unless they are given voice by me....realise this. Only participate when it benefits you directly. All other actions are to be actively ignored, and they are to be given no thought.
They have nothing except what is given to them..they are useless unless they can help you. If they cannot. Ignore them completely.
Do not respond to them. The burden is on them, and they will do nothing because they can do nothong without real people.
The only reason individuals submit to any kind of outside law, code, or strictures is for mutual protection and shared prosperity. It's pretty easy to show the U.S. govt and authorities have stopped providing either of those things. It's pretty easy to show American Citizens have every reason to act as our Declaration of Independence clearly explains American Citizens have a right, even a duty, to act when confronted by a government that has become more of a threat than a benefit.
Yes, but the importance of laying new government cannot be understated. It would still need to abide by the declaration of independence to justify the act, and it would need to establish the government body.
I think the problem with Jan 6 was that it looked like an attempted statement, but it was led by a horned shirtless shaman and a bunch of touristy folk who were excited to go inside and take photos of the building.
Meanwhile Q proclaims it's a movement 😅 and the government proclaims it's a coup 🤪
It was tourists getting excited next to antifa breaking windows and attacking guards.
A real change would have the new government establish a new party and stand as a constitutional party in defense against the establishment. Then it would really rally a cause behind it and focus on being seen as the legitimate party and would cut all ties to the previous ones. No quarter.
In other countries usually the coups are sponsored by nearby countries so they don't have to actually setup anything new. They usually are just puppets for the sponsor or sorts and or partners.
So to avoid that since the states is unique in that way, the best you could do is to form an unofficial government that can effectively manage the roles. That's big. That requires funding, coordination, and it's far more effort than just an election which costs 100's of millions already.
So I'd imagine....you need a billionaire or two just to fund it, and then you need experience and expertise which is free from corruption, that can focus on establishing the laws, managing the military etc.
I imagine the costs to establish a new government would be in 10-50B range over 5-10 years easy. And that would also need to gain support so as to have legitimate control opportunities when the time comes. If they are unknown they will not get military support, they will not get populace support. This will result in illegitimate control and a waste of those billions.
So a real change is needed. But to show the change, you will need to highlight the difference between the present day and the proposed future. And make it realistic such that you don't gloss over the challenges. The challenges must be solved and clearly planned for in order for success.
...what others directed it to be and suggested one to consent to view as.
You mean "American State National" NOT Citizen, very important distinction. You can find why in Redemption Manual. https://conspiracies.win/p/15K6XRJ0Vx/redemption-manual-5--free-from-s/c/
...represents ones willing ignorance of being within natural law, for reasoning among others over suggested laws by others.
Consider being free (living) within shared (process of dying)...what would would happen if one ignores that for sharing what others are suggesting?
a) to stand in direct opposition (confront) implies "reacting" to being opposed.
b) being able to react (choice) implies being within enacting (balance).
a) sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."the RIGHT to be LEFT alone" aka right/left (balance) and to be alone aka ALL(in)ONE aka free will of choice.
b) if one consents to believe in suggested "rights", then one submits self to suggested liberty of others aka "give me liberty or give me death". What one ignores when consenting as choice to suggesting choice, is that "free" will of choice represents LIBERTAS; LIBER -"free".
you have to go back