no evidence at all that those pictures show the same person
a) PER (by) SONOS (sound) implies BY, preposition (Latin pressus) - "partial procession in motion, hence differentiation", while sound implies the whole origin aka sameness.
b) EV'IDENCE, noun [Latin evidentia, from video, to see.] implies perceivable by senses, while suggested "picture" implies through the lens of TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.], hence ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural".
In short...artificial (suggested picture) tempts one to ignore natural (seeing perceivable), while giving those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine and contradict the artificial at will.
no evidence at all that the person on the right is underage
The adhesive bandages represent a legal admission of concern about legal ramifications over showing underage nudity or showing nudity to underage viewers, hence a liability shield.
which option do you prefer?
OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, opto, to wish or desire.] implies ones choice of want over need, hence shirking response-ability (choice). I PREFER', verb [Latin proefero; proe, before, and fero, to bear or carry.] to keep bearing the response-ability (choice) to carry myself within balance by struggling to resist suggested want for perceivable need.
Bonus: "6:05 PM" (11) + "Feb 7" (9) for the 9/11 encoding, 33k likes, Paul Hookem (just like Saul did), and of course the rhetorical chutzpah to imply "you can cut the tits of a girl and pretend her to be a boy, but a mere bandaid is all it takes to legally define her as a girl in the court of public opinion".
Ah, that one. That one is funny.
There is no evidence at all that those pictures show the same person.
There is no evidence at all that the person on the right is underage.
If the person on the right is underage then you are a fucking sick pedo sharing nude pics of a child.
So, which option do you prefer?
a) PER (by) SONOS (sound) implies BY, preposition (Latin pressus) - "partial procession in motion, hence differentiation", while sound implies the whole origin aka sameness.
b) EV'IDENCE, noun [Latin evidentia, from video, to see.] implies perceivable by senses, while suggested "picture" implies through the lens of TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.], hence ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural".
In short...artificial (suggested picture) tempts one to ignore natural (seeing perceivable), while giving those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine and contradict the artificial at will.
The adhesive bandages represent a legal admission of concern about legal ramifications over showing underage nudity or showing nudity to underage viewers, hence a liability shield.
OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, opto, to wish or desire.] implies ones choice of want over need, hence shirking response-ability (choice). I PREFER', verb [Latin proefero; proe, before, and fero, to bear or carry.] to keep bearing the response-ability (choice) to carry myself within balance by struggling to resist suggested want for perceivable need.
Bonus: "6:05 PM" (11) + "Feb 7" (9) for the 9/11 encoding, 33k likes, Paul Hookem (just like Saul did), and of course the rhetorical chutzpah to imply "you can cut the tits of a girl and pretend her to be a boy, but a mere bandaid is all it takes to legally define her as a girl in the court of public opinion".