The thing that fucks with me is that the video cuts very often. I could hold my breath underwater for longer than he did.
Could be an act.
But it's Ukraine, so it could be real. But Ukraine being funded by the US, so it's probably fake. But they use soldiers expendably (ashIey babbltt) so it could actually be real.
Yes, it was. Doesn't matter who you are, or who they are, it's not right. The people defending the use of chemical weapons because "they were attacked" haven't considered history or precedent.
In 2002, a 15-year-old kid ALLEGEDLY - it was never proven - tossed a grenade over a wall and killed an Army medic in Afghanistan. So, the kid was locked away and tortured in gitmo as a "war criminal" (for killing a medic) for 10 years.
Where does the direct use of chemical weapons fall on the "sent to gitmo" scale?
Oh no! Poor russians... this is happening in Ukraine, right? The country that Russia is invading? The country that Russia has no business being in? Wow.
It's almost like if they just packed their shit and went home to that Slavic shithole they call a country, they might not be getting gassed.
There's a video on that thread showing one being dropped on a couple of soldiers... Who then proceed to almost instantly have seizures.
Looks like sarin to me but I'm no CBRN expert.
Can anyone accurately translate what's being said?
Could be real.
The thing that fucks with me is that the video cuts very often. I could hold my breath underwater for longer than he did.
Could be an act.
But it's Ukraine, so it could be real. But Ukraine being funded by the US, so it's probably fake. But they use soldiers expendably (ashIey babbltt) so it could actually be real.
But why.
You could... If you're not having a seizure from a neurotoxin like sarin.
Yes. If it is a genuine video, it looks like the man had a bad end. If it is a faked video with an actor, then his bad end is still yet to come.
True and true.
To me, it appears authentic... But, who knows?
Yes, it was. Doesn't matter who you are, or who they are, it's not right. The people defending the use of chemical weapons because "they were attacked" haven't considered history or precedent.
In 2002, a 15-year-old kid ALLEGEDLY - it was never proven - tossed a grenade over a wall and killed an Army medic in Afghanistan. So, the kid was locked away and tortured in gitmo as a "war criminal" (for killing a medic) for 10 years.
Where does the direct use of chemical weapons fall on the "sent to gitmo" scale?
Rules? For war? That was a short-lived fad from the 20th century. I don't think ethics complaints are going to help, not in this world anyway.
Thats fucken dirty.
Even if it's true, should I feel bad for the Russian invaders?
If you believe in Jesus, then yes. If you believe in Lucifer, then no.
Wut
Elaborate?
Oh no! Poor russians... this is happening in Ukraine, right? The country that Russia is invading? The country that Russia has no business being in? Wow.
It's almost like if they just packed their shit and went home to that Slavic shithole they call a country, they might not be getting gassed.