I have been doing cursory research into terrain theory and germ theory over the past day. Still very much on the fence over which holds more merit than the other. As they are both theories it makes sense to me that neither are 'absolute' as it were as both arguments have their strengths and flaws. I'm interested in hearing what more learned people believe and why.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
When you have time. Watch either of these videos:
Biochemistry debunks Corona Virus, a look at Terrain theory:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/B1OuvLzH6P5i/
The End of Germ Theory:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ch8v4TVL9yq0/
In a way I think both can coexist
A perhaps naive or simple germ theory suggests that germs cause disease
terrain theory asks, why do some people when exposed to the same germs either get sick or do not?
The difference is, some people have weaker immune systems or are more susceptible to the illness: the "terrain" of their body matters when factoring in if they will get sick or not
So a "naive germ theorist" might fail to recommend people build up the "terrain" of the health of their body
a naive terrain theory might deny that germs cause disease at all, which idk if that's the case; I guess a hypothetical "perfect body" (terrain) could not become ill, but we don't have that on earth as much....
Germ theory is a scientific theory according to the principles of the scientific method. In short: germs cause illness.
Terrain theory is not a scientific theory but an idea that lack any scientific merit stating that not further defined imbalances in the body cause illness and that a sick body attracts germs. Some bullshit about alkaline and acidic environments.
My take is that Terrain isn't much of a theory so much as a deposition of viruses. They postulate several possibilities, but from what I can see they are still trying to find what causes sickness to be contagious for some people while ignoring others. Clearly the terrain of an individual will play a role, but there seems to be more to it that is still unknown.
I think they've given enough evidence to put virology into question. More untainted research needs to be done. If we really have been mistaking exosomes for viral matter, there is a need for better technology for viewing things at the nano scale. Being able to observe these nano particles in real-time without affecting them would be ideal.
Short version is both can exist at the same time in part. Terrain being that your bodies health affects how many things will affect your body and that essentially most sickness is caused by your immune system getting out of whack and that allowing things already in your system to get out of normal proportion, which causes problems (sickness) the more out of whack it gets. Germ theory acts as if the inside of your body is sterile and lacks any micro-organisms at all unless they are introduced from the outside, and that those make you sick. We already know our bodies are filled with all kinds of bacteria and our systems are used to offload the waste that the bacteria in us are always producing already as well as keep in line the relative populations of them.
External things getting into the body does happen, but terrain states that the majority of things causing illness are already inside you.
Bullshit. Germ theory doesn't claim that.