I have been doing cursory research into terrain theory and germ theory over the past day. Still very much on the fence over which holds more merit than the other. As they are both theories it makes sense to me that neither are 'absolute' as it were as both arguments have their strengths and flaws. I'm interested in hearing what more learned people believe and why.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
My take is that Terrain isn't much of a theory so much as a deposition of viruses. They postulate several possibilities, but from what I can see they are still trying to find what causes sickness to be contagious for some people while ignoring others. Clearly the terrain of an individual will play a role, but there seems to be more to it that is still unknown.
I think they've given enough evidence to put virology into question. More untainted research needs to be done. If we really have been mistaking exosomes for viral matter, there is a need for better technology for viewing things at the nano scale. Being able to observe these nano particles in real-time without affecting them would be ideal.