Respectfully.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
If the earth is flat...then it was indeed created by a space sky daddy. Also makes "science" less believe able. Because that means all the "space" shit all the funding has been going to is a lie.
The Earth being a big ball spinning left to chance and slime turning into primates, then to us. Is how Atheists shit over the God theory.
I dont know about flat earth. I dont care about the shape of this fucker we are on to be honest.
I get it man. I do not trust the narrative. But to me. I am more after spiritual growth, and pursuing knowledge on how to better myself, and heal myself and the Earths energetic fields.
I already understand there is controllers of knowledge. Those who want to keep us dumb and blind.
I watched a few FE videos. Watched some crater earth videos which all made sense.
To me....i'd rather know ju jitsu, than the shape of this shithole we are on.....
Get what I mean?
So you're implying the spinning ball theory was created to like...fund NASA and to get people to stop believing in God?
Maybe the latter but seeing as how NASA didn't create that theory I struggled to see the plausibility of the former, seeing as how it was an idea that first became popular in the 1500s. Not sure how "they" were making money on that notion way back then. But if they were, I'm open to hearing about it.
*Edit - or are you saying it's a desperate attempt by theists to discredit the arguments of atheists?
Nah I am saying the spinning ball is currently being used to fun NASA. I believe Athiests use this to discredit God. The Church.
IF The Earth is flat that would 100% mean divine intervention.
BUT IF the Earth is flat all the flight plans, all the data, all the "space photos" are a lie......NASA is in charge of the lie.
As I said I dont have any skin in the game. As I dont give a shit what shape we are on. :D
I guess I don't personally see how a spinning ball and the Big Bang denotes a lack of divine intervention. Perhaps that's why I struggle with understanding the need for this theory.
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]...reasoning (wanting vs not wanting) over the spoken suggestions by others will keep both sides within perpetual conflict.
Agreement vs disagreement or want vs not want or belief vs disbelief or true vs false or flat vs heliocentric...whatever side one chooses, one is stuck reasoning against the opposition. That's the mental prison the many put themselves into when consenting to the suggestions of the few.
Meanwhile...perceivable nature doesn't speak; it doesn't utter words; it doesn't brand anything; it doesn't reason...it represents order; balance; sound; differentiation; flow etc.
We know the cabal refuses entry to actual atheists. Public facing atheists belonging to the cabal are likely lying in order to recruit more atheists away from the theist camp--more specifically the Christian theist camp. The cabal is deeply religious in the most horrific sense. The cabal wants to create atheists to fight against Christian theists. They want us to think the atheists are the enemy. The atheists are the victims of the lie. They know not what they do or for whom they do it.