interseting write up regarding the Shroud of Turin.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
No it was debunked. As either an inquisition victim possibly female dna. Or a dead crusader. The carbon dating is massively out putting it in the 13 or 1400s.
It emphatically is nothing else. After it had been debunked look it up, those hits. I am sure your story holds merit, the church didn't want anybody undermining it. Because to the believer it only wanted validity of which there was none.
> No it was debunked. As either an inquisition victim possibly female dna. Or a dead crusader. The carbon dating is massively out putting it in the 13 or 1400s.
addressed in screencap
What was debunked. The debunk wasn't debunked. Hence no more debunking. You has faith.
Let's suggest it was Jesus than he didn't resurrect either. Big problem.
But I do believe it was debunked. I read this years ago. Carbon dating out. Forget which DNA. Years ago. I haven't bothered to link. But I can to refresh my memory if you need this info.
> What was debunked.
addressed in the screencap.
https://www.livescience.com/63093-shroud-of-turin-is-fake-bloodstains.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/turin-shroud-latest-fake-forgery-scientific-blood-pattern-spatter-study-carbon-dating-debunked-a8450101.html
https://www.ufoinsight.com/conspiracy/historical/turin-shroud-jacques-de-molay
https://www.history.com/news/shroud-turin-forensic-study-not-jesus-burial-cloth
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/17/the-1m-challenge-if-the-turin-shroud-is-a-forgery-show-how-it-was-done
Good okay thanks. Dunno why thought was woman. Dunno what that was about maybe Joan of Arc. Something. Another mythological tale. Perhaps