I'm sorry if this isn't worded well, the idea isn't yet crystallized in my mind such that I can precisely express it. (foreshadowing)
Basically, when the 'Al' is given a prompt, it takes a random image of chaos and adjusts the variations in the pixels over many steps into a target or goal image.
Youtube - Computerphile - Stable Diffusion In Code
Pretty awesome. The video I linked he made frogs on stilts. Wild.
But what if the parameters of this algorithm are changed? Say, the input goal instead of an image of frogs you ask for Complete Control of Earth. Then, instead of starting with random noise, it starts with a snapshot of the entire world in its current state. The Al adjusts the virtual world in small increments, revealing a path of little steps from point A to point B.
Whoever runs this algorithm learns of a way to turn chaotic Earth under his complete control. All he needs is for all the world to stop and smile for the photo. How long did it take to Stable Diffuse a plan for world domination? About two more weeks...
In conclusion, the "AI art" Stable Diffusion algorithm can be used as a plan-maker. Think of who gathers the most algorithm-training data and who has the most computational power.
P.s. if they're giving free versions of this tech to the general public, does that mean they have applied the algorithm and are already enacting their plan? Is the Villain revealing his scheme because he feels we're inescapably trapped?
Can't. The program is built to make images. Grand strategy is completely outside of what it can do. Ask for complete control of Earth and it'll just make an image, that's all it can do
You'd need to build a machine learning program and train it with data. They learn by repetition and trial and error. This is easy enough when the AI is just playing with a few pixels, but how do you train it for world domination? The data you'd need for that is impossible. It would require a matrix-like simulation of Earth for the program to learn in, and it would need to be computed way faster than reality. It's not possible on any level
Either that, or it would have to run a local instance for each person. I like the idea of "we're living in a simulation" and I'm glad you don't feel like the SkyNet MotherBrain could possibly run properly with modern computers.
Yes.
The plain truth, the answer is yes. The first successful AI that was implemented in order to be able to profit using an algorithm is still being used today. The system monitors the stock markets and makes trades faster than an human could possibly dream.
What does this have to do with what OP posted about? The easiest way it can be said is...... The technology that the masses have access to is already outdated in terms of where the current actual cutting edge technology resides. The idea of an AI being able to give a roadmap to success persay is an old and already utilized concept. When people go online to discuss such endeavors you instantly witness the debunking and trashing of the concept by trolls as well as bots whose sole purpose is to keep the masses in a state of fog, unable to disseminate fact from fiction.
So yes. You bet your ass that AI is currently being used to help terraform public opinion and push us in the direction the keyholders wish.
Project looking glass gave us a window in order to see the future events that mankind will have to face. In the end, all timelines, all scenarios lead to the same climactic event that cannot be avoided. Some are currently trying to push us into that end as soon as possible while others are actively trying to postpone it in order to try to change the ultimate end.
I realize I'm all over the map here, but then again this is a conspiracy forum so yeah.
If anybody thinks that the technology were using today did not exist 40 years ago under wraps needs to learn more about Hollywood and how their used to steer our society. Just think star trek in the early years.
Carry On!!!
You say in one sentence what I struggle to say in a page.
But notice, I call it the capital A lowercase L, not the capital A capital i. I see it as an algorithm, not a lifeform.
AI is derivative, not constructive. if you trained in AI to take over the world, the plan it would come up with would be in amalgamation of existing plans.
Which I guess is why it's looked a lot like Fahrenheit 451, Tom Clancy, Jack Reacher, 1984, Brave New World, Paradise Lost, mixed with The Simpsons.
Please expand further on this - this is interesting, but I don't fully understand what you mean; do you mean that by simply getting peeps' attention (for the pic), it is controlling them (in that moment) by gaining their attention?
That's a good point, but what I was talking about doesn't involve actual images/jpegs at all. Only a different usage of the same algorithm.
Like, the Al in my example maybe someone wants everyone wearing pink shirts. So the User shows the algorithm how many people are currently wearing pink shirts. It goes over the data, and says:
"in order to reach a hypothetical future timeline when all people wear pink shirts, first make women love pink clothes. Next make gays love pink. Next make people who hate cancer love pink. Next show celebrities wearing pink."
And instead of the algorithm being used to convert a smudge of an image into a crisp picture of a frog, it gives the blueprint to turn a smudge of a human into a crisp picture of a globalist.
I'll keep trying to explain what I'm saying until eventually I find the words. Thanks for coming along with me.
I think I understand what you're saying now, and I think this is essentially a high level understanding of exactly how "they" control everyone.
I just made this post reply about this, because I feel like it's too big to be just a comment: https://conspiracies.win/p/16a9lbZB1p/