If he were actually a scientist then he'd understand the relative risk reduction. We've known since the first few months of vaccines being out that the ARR and RRR were unfavorable except for some of the more extreme preexisting conditions. And now (as of the date of the interview) we can also dispute the use for those scenarios.
If he were actually a scientist then he'd understand the relative risk reduction. We've known since the first few months of vaccines being out that the ARR and RRR were unfavorable except for some of the more extreme preexisting conditions. And now (as of the date of the interview) we can also dispute the use for those scenarios.
I've never liked the guy. Even going way back he's been so arrogant and unscientific in his approach to discussions with others