This video by Rich Hall is old. He and Andrew Johnson did further research and no longer fully support much of the theories put forward by Simon Shack / September Clues. In fact most of what Shack says in those films has been completely dismissed by both Rich and Andrew as demonstrable lies and knowing ignorance by Shack.
For example Rich did an analysis of the radar information later and determined the info matches the path of both planes, and the "ball" follows the trajectory of the plane radar too. There of course remains the possibility that the planes are not what they seem, The ball thing has not been explained. But this is not proven by September Clues at all. Live Chroma Key effects were not used on live tv on 9/11 to cover up a "ball". See the videos on this channel about September Clues for detailed debunking:
In fact it is believed by some of these guys that Simon Shack was a paid disinfo operator, due to his fathers connection to the UN and his repeated ignorance of communications that showed his theories to be bunk.
It has been demonstrated that Simon Shack uses creative editing to remove shots or cut them short, which contradict and thus disprove the theory he is propounding on screen. There is convincing analysis of the "nose out" footage, using photographs from other angles, that the "nose" is actually explosive ejaculation from the opposite side of the building. Please look at Mark Conlon's channel above and also Rich Planets website, specifically ALL his 9/11 videos.
Also Andrew Johnsons website - neither Andrew or Rich support Simon Shack any more and have determined him to be a liar, unserious researcher or even a disinfo plant:
Working out what really happened has been a difficult journey for most honest researchers. This is because there are as many "muddle up merchants" operating in 9/11 research as there are genuine truth seekers. The muddle up merchants have been trying to discredit all of the video footage, some of which provides clues to what really happened. Evidence that passenger jet planes were used in any of the four attacks is slim to non existent. Today Richard is joined by Mark Conlon and Andrew Johnson who dispel some of the dis-information and hence get closer to the truth on the 9/11 plane issue.
The reason why people can't stand this video is because it leaves you with more uncomfortable questions than you started with and a feeling that they'll never be answered.
No, I'm asking because I was actually there that morning IRL and didn't see a ball or a plane on the second tower and no other video I've seen in 20 years shows a ball. Where would they shoot a ball from?
You weren't there, you probably weren't even born yet. Probably never even been to New York. You haven't seen any videos except this one that weren't first confiscated and edited.
Thank you. I just finished this (op) video; amazing. I'm not sure it has to be an anti-gravity drone, but it's certainly not a plane, and his angle and speed analysis is absolutely epic.
Ah, thank you, so then the corrected angle in the "ball" video explains the speed discrepancy and the visual discrepancy. It was an interesting foray last night, for me, imagining that the illusion was performed only on film (that anyone IRL would have seen a ball or some disc). There is no good explanation for the missing plane, nor the nosecone poke, in the case of the faraway helo footage.
I wish we could just know what really happened that morning; there are so many opposing theories, and so many impossible to explain things, and for folks who saw it happening live on TV, esp when they were young adults, 9/11 was such a defining moment in our psyches. I must have watched the TV for 24 hours straight, and then weeks later when I stumbled into a video on Albino Black Sheep about the pentagon not being hit by a plane, it became my mission in life for the longest time to find out what really happened.
Interesting video. More interesting due to the instant backlash you are getting for posting it. I guess it makes it easier to see who these other commenter are working for from now on.
I clicked enough of it to see what they were claiming was the evidence at hand.
You would have to check your brain at the door to even begin to walk down this road of preposterous shit.
This is meant to detract from the truth, that it was destroyed by khazarian criminals.
The same ones who celebrate it and spread false lies continually about it and everything else, criminals and here you are siding with them, noted.
Ad hominim. Classic shill slider, putting words in people's mouths. Who the fuck in your mind is saying khazars/canaanite/masons didn't destroy it? We all know who did it, we're debating how, gatekeeper, and this is valid information that needs to be scrutinized, not dismissed out of hand with your bullshit non-arguments. haha conspiracy theorists would have to be crazy to watch this video, amirite? Why do you want it gone so badly?
I could give a shit about your useless video nor your useless words.
Angry little thing, you posted a nonsense video with video claims that do not amount to anything, just what exactly is the bottom line here? It was not the demolition but the magic sphere ball in your video.
ahh yes, the standard millennial brainwipe trying to act tough but showing up like a weak minded little manlet, you are just angry cause I exposed your idiocy and how simple you are.
Get over yourself, if you post shit you need to expect to get the response induced.
Your brainless video makes no sense, like your weak little rants of vitriol, beat it loser.
This video by Rich Hall is old. He and Andrew Johnson did further research and no longer fully support much of the theories put forward by Simon Shack / September Clues. In fact most of what Shack says in those films has been completely dismissed by both Rich and Andrew as demonstrable lies and knowing ignorance by Shack.
For example Rich did an analysis of the radar information later and determined the info matches the path of both planes, and the "ball" follows the trajectory of the plane radar too. There of course remains the possibility that the planes are not what they seem, The ball thing has not been explained. But this is not proven by September Clues at all. Live Chroma Key effects were not used on live tv on 9/11 to cover up a "ball". See the videos on this channel about September Clues for detailed debunking:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/7lgjW62bk5h9/
In fact it is believed by some of these guys that Simon Shack was a paid disinfo operator, due to his fathers connection to the UN and his repeated ignorance of communications that showed his theories to be bunk.
It has been demonstrated that Simon Shack uses creative editing to remove shots or cut them short, which contradict and thus disprove the theory he is propounding on screen. There is convincing analysis of the "nose out" footage, using photographs from other angles, that the "nose" is actually explosive ejaculation from the opposite side of the building. Please look at Mark Conlon's channel above and also Rich Planets website, specifically ALL his 9/11 videos.
Also Andrew Johnsons website - neither Andrew or Rich support Simon Shack any more and have determined him to be a liar, unserious researcher or even a disinfo plant:
https://www.richplanet.net/
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre_menu.php?gen=3
An explanation about why the 9/11 video and radar analysis was undertaken
Rich explains the further research he did - using radar info - after OP's video. VERY IMPORTANT TO WATCH THIS.
9/11 disinfo and lack of evidence of planes
Towers took a direct hit to the chest. A clear case of commotio cordis.
Where did the ball come from? Why would they use a ball and not a missle?
The reason why people can't stand this video is because it leaves you with more uncomfortable questions than you started with and a feeling that they'll never be answered.
No, I'm asking because I was actually there that morning IRL and didn't see a ball or a plane on the second tower and no other video I've seen in 20 years shows a ball. Where would they shoot a ball from?
It looks like it was flying on it's own.
You weren't there, you probably weren't even born yet. Probably never even been to New York. You haven't seen any videos except this one that weren't first confiscated and edited.
Holy shit, just starting, never seen this before, anybody have a link today September Clues video he mentions?
EDIT: this video is an incredible addition to the corpus of a priori 9/11 evidence.
https://fakeotube.com/v/31#
Thank you. I just finished this (op) video; amazing. I'm not sure it has to be an anti-gravity drone, but it's certainly not a plane, and his angle and speed analysis is absolutely epic.
Reposting the links here for archive:
Please watch this video, it is an important update to the work Rich Hall did following the OP video, which is over 10 years old:
https://player.odycdn.com/api/v4/streams/free/291_01/58a63454ff4bbb4944f9496626a23fe3eaeff800/a0e216
Ah, thank you, so then the corrected angle in the "ball" video explains the speed discrepancy and the visual discrepancy. It was an interesting foray last night, for me, imagining that the illusion was performed only on film (that anyone IRL would have seen a ball or some disc). There is no good explanation for the missing plane, nor the nosecone poke, in the case of the faraway helo footage.
I wish we could just know what really happened that morning; there are so many opposing theories, and so many impossible to explain things, and for folks who saw it happening live on TV, esp when they were young adults, 9/11 was such a defining moment in our psyches. I must have watched the TV for 24 hours straight, and then weeks later when I stumbled into a video on Albino Black Sheep about the pentagon not being hit by a plane, it became my mission in life for the longest time to find out what really happened.
Interesting video. More interesting due to the instant backlash you are getting for posting it. I guess it makes it easier to see who these other commenter are working for from now on.
Thanks for posting.
Instant and persistent. People push 911 mini nukes and DEW's all the time nobody bats a eye but throw this video out and they won't let up.
For Sale: 1 london bridge, pm me for details.
Non-sequitur. You didn't even have time to watch the whole thing.
I clicked enough of it to see what they were claiming was the evidence at hand.
You would have to check your brain at the door to even begin to walk down this road of preposterous shit.
This is meant to detract from the truth, that it was destroyed by khazarian criminals. The same ones who celebrate it and spread false lies continually about it and everything else, criminals and here you are siding with them, noted.
Ad hominim. Classic shill slider, putting words in people's mouths. Who the fuck in your mind is saying khazars/canaanite/masons didn't destroy it? We all know who did it, we're debating how, gatekeeper, and this is valid information that needs to be scrutinized, not dismissed out of hand with your bullshit non-arguments. haha conspiracy theorists would have to be crazy to watch this video, amirite? Why do you want it gone so badly?
I could give a shit about your useless video nor your useless words.
Angry little thing, you posted a nonsense video with video claims that do not amount to anything, just what exactly is the bottom line here? It was not the demolition but the magic sphere ball in your video.
Go fuck yourself, get a brain.
You could give a shit, yet here you still are. Cool story bro.
ahh yes, the standard millennial brainwipe trying to act tough but showing up like a weak minded little manlet, you are just angry cause I exposed your idiocy and how simple you are.
Get over yourself, if you post shit you need to expect to get the response induced.
Your brainless video makes no sense, like your weak little rants of vitriol, beat it loser.
What did you expose exactly? You haven't addressed anything in the video, you just attack me directly and know nothing about me. Cheap jew bot antics.