There needs to be an explanation for their genotype appearing across the globe in the “indigenous peoples” of the world
Technology explains.Technology.
ET or genetically modified humans. Biggest cities like now concentrated in coastal and valley areas. Some day was landing,or they were humans and fleed everywhere.
(or mix of that)
Very possible "racial" or other conflict of human subspecies/aliens before 10k BCE. Or "extinction event"
But why everywhere ?
A).Becoming rulling class requires having enough subjects if you lost/are loosing access to technology
B).Spreading knowledge everywhere guarantees it would be handed over.
C). Accident which resulted from lack of coordination and communication (doubtful)
I’m inclined to believe they meant what they said, when they all called this group/race “giants” - but admittedly the notion that their large stature was simply “in the eye of the beholder” or somehow otherwise a metaphorical statement can’t be ruled out.
My best understanding is that, in the past, society/civilization has risen and fallen. The most coherent explanation for what appears to be a “common cultural ancestor” is exactly that - a group who was forced to spread out in diaspora (ecological disaster/warfare induced migration). Then, because of this disaster and diaspora, these different locations were unable to contact eachother, and thus what started as a common cultural influence gradually changed as different local factors impacted the development of these new civilizations [made up of small numbers of diaspora members and relatively far larger numbers of “primitive” (aka “suited to life after a disaster) locals.]
@Graphenium : mostly inactive recessive gene for humans.
Probably too much "white etnonationalism here" and it is bad as it would be treated as a bullshit.
Thing is however you are mostly correct. Irish have mostly red hair, both Irish and Basques have highest percent of 0 negatives.
Guess what - it was predictable: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/1256894.stm
Oldest and most insulated populations however it is REALLY why they keep it.
Those thing about "giants" look rather like nonsense done by some protestant reading bible too much times.
I think most important archeological things are both under Northern See and Black See. "Flood" ? Well,not only "flood": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Dryas_impact_hypothesis - natural
less natural:
https://www.science.org/content/article/can-nuclear-fallout-make-it-rain
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM4989.html
Technology explains.Technology.
ET or genetically modified humans. Biggest cities like now concentrated in coastal and valley areas. Some day was landing,or they were humans and fleed everywhere. (or mix of that)
Very possible "racial" or other conflict of human subspecies/aliens before 10k BCE. Or "extinction event"
But why everywhere ?
A).Becoming rulling class requires having enough subjects if you lost/are loosing access to technology B).Spreading knowledge everywhere guarantees it would be handed over. C). Accident which resulted from lack of coordination and communication (doubtful)
I’m inclined to believe they meant what they said, when they all called this group/race “giants” - but admittedly the notion that their large stature was simply “in the eye of the beholder” or somehow otherwise a metaphorical statement can’t be ruled out.
My best understanding is that, in the past, society/civilization has risen and fallen. The most coherent explanation for what appears to be a “common cultural ancestor” is exactly that - a group who was forced to spread out in diaspora (ecological disaster/warfare induced migration). Then, because of this disaster and diaspora, these different locations were unable to contact eachother, and thus what started as a common cultural influence gradually changed as different local factors impacted the development of these new civilizations [made up of small numbers of diaspora members and relatively far larger numbers of “primitive” (aka “suited to life after a disaster) locals.]