Whatever kind of camera it was it must be pretty amazing to survive extreme temperatures, a almost perfect vacuum, and the van allen radiation belt with no problems. Wouldn't the stars also be far brighter with no atmosphere? Odd we NEVER see them, I think I know why.
Except that you don't know why for any of those things. For example during the moon landings the camera settings used would not have registered the stars on film. So technically that aspect of the photographs was accurate. But it's pointless bringing them up because those cameras shouldn't have operated at those temps on the moons surface anyway. And the film would have been destroyed by temps and radiation. So talking about stars is pointless.
I am (safely) presuming on artemis they're not using a film camera. They use some type of digital censor. So then we have a different story, and that needs to be adressed. It probably should not function in space either, due to radiation / temperatures or other reasons. So then all the content we see is probably fake.
But you haven't made that determination based on the content of the image. You simply haven't demonstrated know how the image should look. Whoever potentially faked it probably knows much more than you how it should look, and that's is why they have made it look as it does.
Whatever kind of camera it was it must be pretty amazing to survive extreme temperatures, a almost perfect vacuum, and the van allen radiation belt with no problems. Wouldn't the stars also be far brighter with no atmosphere? Odd we NEVER see them, I think I know why.
Except that you don't know why for any of those things. For example during the moon landings the camera settings used would not have registered the stars on film. So technically that aspect of the photographs was accurate. But it's pointless bringing them up because those cameras shouldn't have operated at those temps on the moons surface anyway. And the film would have been destroyed by temps and radiation. So talking about stars is pointless.
I am (safely) presuming on artemis they're not using a film camera. They use some type of digital censor. So then we have a different story, and that needs to be adressed. It probably should not function in space either, due to radiation / temperatures or other reasons. So then all the content we see is probably fake.
But you haven't made that determination based on the content of the image. You simply haven't demonstrated know how the image should look. Whoever potentially faked it probably knows much more than you how it should look, and that's is why they have made it look as it does.