Interesting thread claiming to ID FBI agent provocateurs
(threadreaderapp.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
Not all but some are there, undoubtedly, and you'd be surprised, how many are. But facial I.D is about 90%-99% wrong. Terrible thread.
I'll also ask why would any woman cut her hair like that, she has long blonde hair, it is done well? Suddenly she becomes an FBI, what went wrong, she cut it, it looks horrible, also her face is completely different. Hair like that doesn't grow back. Yes there are these horrible extensions and wigs. Until you touch it. Omg they're so disgusting. Hair extensions and wigs. Have you got cancer, are you troon. Then wtf, why is your head full of shit. Please tell me?
Make the bad threads go away.
Do you have any life experience. Any. What woman cuts their hair, when it's like that? Which one. No job, is worth that. They'd regret it, until the day it falls out. They only cut it when they cannot manage it, yes occasionally for job. Not that woman. But not if it looks like that. Look at her hair. Look at picture. Suddenly you're selling me bullshit. On most of that other shit. Sure a nigger doesn't understand it, I bet. They've got the shit hair. Look at her hair. Look, all those years growing it. Soft and feathered, suddenly gonna FBI in the field with a little pony tail. Nope. Different woman.
As far as that kind of recognition it's almost 90% wrong. Look it up.
I don't give a shit about FBI. I made comment you autistically dumb nigger on how that shit is wrong. On most of its crap. It might be right subjectively. But it's wrong on that recognition. Anybody can say look at it. Subjectively they're everywhere.
I agree that some of them are not matches, but a few appear to be the same. Especially the Minnesota cop.
The OP of the investigative thread should take this to the chans. There is opensource FRT they can point to, and they already have compiled nicknames and video compilations of a lot of these guys. Video is better than still photos, because gait, blinks, nervous ticks, etc. can be analyzed.
I disagree with you completely about facial recognition. Humans may have a high degree of error rate, but AI facial recognition tech is over 97% accurate, even with sunglasses, hats, and covid masks. Maybe not wearing all 3 at the same time… but there’s video of an olympian wearing a hat and a covid mask going through a FRT scanner in China in a crowd and it confirms his identity. You can also unlock your iphone with FRT wearing a mask and hat. There’s a story going around about a female attorney that went to an event at MSG and was asked to leave by security after being seated, because hidden FRT had her on a no-entry list as an attorney involved in a case against MSG’s parent company.
This shit is scary accurate, and as AI, i believe the heavy software used by intelligence services can extrapolate and compile more data, i.e. give it a single photograph with or without a name, it can find that person’s social accounts and pull those pics, and be even more accurate. 99%+— It can probably pull EXIF data on the original photo and look for other shots within the same vicinity, and repeat that, compound that, search the phones/clouds of people in your network for more photos of you, security and CCT footage of you around your house and work, etc.
Nope facial recognition is 90% wrong when it's like that. Look it up. They started installing them in London. Rights groups went ape shit.
They're a gimmick. The real recognition is your phone and card.
So I went drinking down this pub down there in center. No cash. It wants to I.D you. Literally wants to I.D you now. Above the bar is CCTV. As soon as card ding ding, caught. Now ping ping ping to all other camera. Same as your fucking smart phone, its GPS. Cameras are a mindtrick. Once recognised it can validate to extents. But it's all that other shit, compromising your I.D. Once they have tagged it, then it can make matches, where ding ding you pass through the grid.
Do you understand it? It cannot successfully identify oh that's a criminal we better tag them. It confuses them with everybody else. It's bad. That recognition is bananas, getting better. As soon as they're tagged by using their identity, it is compromised by almost everything now, walking radar phones, cards, transport passes, the net closes, it can then faster trace them on all the other cameras. Like bloodhound.