Anyone that researches this particular subject personally will find that there are a number of suggested origins for the name, none of which are obviously conclusive. James Mason (<- really?) states his flatly as if it's definitive. That's poor scholarship and a characteristic technique of disinfo, and thus should arouse our suspicions.
The particular line of etymology to which I was drawn went something like "hebrew" <- "ibru" <- "ibri", where the last would have identified a native of the Sumerian city of Nibru.
Why did I key on that? Well "Nibru" is a corruption of the original name "Niibru", meaning something like, "the place of the crossing". Crucially, though, the city would appear to be originally named after "Nibiru", or "the planet of the crossing". And--you got it--that's the home planet of the Anunnaki.
(BTW, Abraham, originally Abram, was born in "Ur of the Chaldees", another Sumerian city. So I guess Mason is not 100% off target.)
In 1976, Zecharia Sitchin wrote "The Twelfth Planet," a book which used Stitchin's own 'unique' translation of Sumerian cuneiform to identify a planet, Nibiru, orbiting the sun every 3,600 years.
The mistranslation was intentional fraud. I've known how and better yet, why this fraud was continued by NASA and others for over 40 years.
Ur/Chaldees/Babylon/Sumer/Phoenicia/Nibru et al are of similar cosmology, and what they share that would explain all, including today's psyop about it, is always missing from the dialogue.
Do you actually have any interest in this? Do you have a specific question? Or were you just insulted and this was meant to be some sort of rebuttal but lacking content?
I had a feeling you might be hostile to any sort of contradiction, which I find a sign of immaturity and a fragile ego, but just let me know and I'll block you so I'll have no future opportunity to either contradict or to support you.
The actual information, for all to see, is that you posted a quote from someone else's work and now apparently consider it incumbent on me to refute "you". That's a dazzling lack of self-awareness, chief.
You also demonstrate a keen lack of awareness of being taunted and ridiculed. Autism does indeed have its benefits.
As I've seen you're type many times before, I know you can't rest until you've had the last word, so go ahead and post whatever "clever" non-sequitur you have in store. Get it on the record that I have foreseen even that from you.
My research led me to a different conclusion.
Anyone that researches this particular subject personally will find that there are a number of suggested origins for the name, none of which are obviously conclusive. James Mason (<- really?) states his flatly as if it's definitive. That's poor scholarship and a characteristic technique of disinfo, and thus should arouse our suspicions.
The particular line of etymology to which I was drawn went something like "hebrew" <- "ibru" <- "ibri", where the last would have identified a native of the Sumerian city of Nibru.
Why did I key on that? Well "Nibru" is a corruption of the original name "Niibru", meaning something like, "the place of the crossing". Crucially, though, the city would appear to be originally named after "Nibiru", or "the planet of the crossing". And--you got it--that's the home planet of the Anunnaki.
(BTW, Abraham, originally Abram, was born in "Ur of the Chaldees", another Sumerian city. So I guess Mason is not 100% off target.)
In 1976, Zecharia Sitchin wrote "The Twelfth Planet," a book which used Stitchin's own 'unique' translation of Sumerian cuneiform to identify a planet, Nibiru, orbiting the sun every 3,600 years.
The mistranslation was intentional fraud. I've known how and better yet, why this fraud was continued by NASA and others for over 40 years.
Ur/Chaldees/Babylon/Sumer/Phoenicia/Nibru et al are of similar cosmology, and what they share that would explain all, including today's psyop about it, is always missing from the dialogue.
Yes the 'hebrew' thread connects.
Do you actually have any interest in this? Do you have a specific question? Or were you just insulted and this was meant to be some sort of rebuttal but lacking content?
I had a feeling you might be hostile to any sort of contradiction, which I find a sign of immaturity and a fragile ego, but just let me know and I'll block you so I'll have no future opportunity to either contradict or to support you.
How did I know you wouldn't read that, let alone respond appropriately? (<-- that's rhetorical, don't bother answering)
Do you think I get anything out of engaging with people who have such a level of consciousness? (<-- that's also rhetorical, don't bother answering)
The actual information, for all to see, is that you posted a quote from someone else's work and now apparently consider it incumbent on me to refute "you". That's a dazzling lack of self-awareness, chief.
You also demonstrate a keen lack of awareness of being taunted and ridiculed. Autism does indeed have its benefits.
As I've seen you're type many times before, I know you can't rest until you've had the last word, so go ahead and post whatever "clever" non-sequitur you have in store. Get it on the record that I have foreseen even that from you.