Lately I dove into the solfeggio frequencies (f) and the claim they are healing f. They are in Hertz (Hz):
174, 285, 396, 417, 528, 639, 741, 852, 963.
Some authors say it is only 6 solfeggio f, others more, but nevertheless.
All solfeggio f have in common, that their checksum can be divided by 3, 6, or 9. Let us check:
Checksum of 174 = (1+7+4) = 12, which can be divded by 6.
Checksum of 285 = (2+8+5) = 15, which can be divided by 3.
Checksum fo 396 (3+9+6) = 18, which can be divided by 9.
I took the highest possible divisor.
You can do the other numbers as homework, if you like.
First question: Why do other f, that have the same checksum properties as the solfeggio f not also have healing qualities?
For example f being:
51, 60, 63, 69, 72, 147, 399, etc.
Second question: What other common denominator do the solfeggio f have besides divisible by 3, 6 and 9?
Conclusion: If there isn't a hidden common denominator of these solfeggio f, then those frequencies defy logic, and then the Creator built an unlogical universe and logic must be something he does not like.
I did my research on this and found this:
Thesis no. 1 says:
Dr. Joseph Puleo found in the 1970’s the frequencies with the use of the Pythagorean method of numeral reduction to unravel six mathematically encoded patterns he found in the Bible.
Argument: Puleo takes the Bible as reference of truth, which can and should be questionned.
Thesis no 2. says:
It is the “Schumann Resonance Frequency- This is the measurable frequency around the Earth and is equal to 7.83Hz.
Let us test: To get the lower octaves of a specific f, you have to divide by 2:
Solfeggio 174:
87 (first lower octave) 43.5 (second lower octave), 21.75, 10.875
Solfeggio 285:
142.5, 71,25, 35.625, 17.8125, 8.90625
Solfeggio 396:
198, 99, 49.5, 24.75, 12.375, 6.1875
Solfeggio 417:
208.5 104.25 52.125, 26.0625, 13.03125, 6.515625
Solfeggio 528:
264, 132, 66, 33, 16.5, 8.25
Solfeggio 639:
319.5, 159.75, 79.875, 39.9375, 19.96875, 9.984375
Solfeggio 741: 370.5, 185.25, 92.625, 46.3125, 23.15625, 11.578125
Solfeggio 852:
426, 213, 106.5, 53.25, 26.625, 13.3125, 6.65625
Solfeggio 963:
481.5, 240.75, 120.375, 60.1875, 30.59375, 15.296875, 7.6484375
Conclusion of thesis 2: Not even one of the solfeggio f comes close to the Schumann resonance, at least not when we think in Octaves.Some authors say, the Schumann resonance is between 7.83 Hz and 8 Hz.But then again not even close to our lower octaves. Maybe they are related in thirds or fiths etc. Butb then again, the Creator does not like octaves or he would not have chosen those weird frequencies.
Conclusion no 3: Maybe these given frequencies are fake and don't heal at all?
Stay tuned for part 2.
There's no such thing as solfeggio frequencies. Solfeggio is just the way of turning notes into syllables, as in: do re me fa so la ti.
Solfeggio does not take into account what f a note is tuned to such as A=432 or A=440.
I'm not saying that frequencies don't heal and other stuff. I'm just saying that solfeggio is not an applicable term.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solf%C3%A8ge
I was going to ask what f was tuned to for the purposes of this article.
a) the SOL within solfeggio represents SOL'ID, adjective - "pressurized setting", hence form (life) pressured within flow (inception towards death).
b) numbers (plural) are suggest to tempt one (singular) to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one".
c) living within the process of dying represents partial (integral) within whole (integer) aka different ones within the same oneness, hence the self differentiation of whole (process of dying) into partial (living) representing the designation of oneness into ones.
d) temporary form (resistance) can only exist within the momentum (balance) of ongoing flow (velocity). The center of an enacting balance implies a reacting (free will of) choice.
e) if ongoing velocity meets temporary resistance, then that implies the origin of friction; vibration and sound, while the choice within the momentum of sound implies resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
a) you (life) exist within constant change (inception towards death).
b) flow (process of dying) represents the predefined foundation for all the form (living) within. In other words...perceivable sound predefines every suggested word within.
c) the PHOENICIANS (those who resonate with perceivable sound) shaped everyone else through the use of suggested words (dissonance) to ignore perceivable sound, hence becoming DEAF PHOENICIANS (definitions).
In short...the many are tempted to ignore predefined (perceivable sound) for definitions (suggested words) by the few, hence falling for spell-craft.
Adaptation by perceiving choice (reaction) to perceivable balance (enacting) represents frequency, hence repetition through adaptation (resonance or dissonance) at short intervals within perceivable sound.
The ongoing natural order (process of dying) represents the source of healing for the temporary chaos (living) struggling with sickness within. The few suggest the inversion thereof, hence tempting the many to seek order out of chaos, instead of struggling to sustain temporary chaos by adaptation to ongoing order.
Notice the suggested zero (0) to tempt the perceiving one (1) to ignore perceivable oneness (1)...the few suggest 0 (nothing) to ignore each one thing (perceiving partial) to ignore everything (perceivable whole).
There's no such thing as 0 within ongoing motion; nor within perceivable sound, hence an ongoing friction; vibration as the foundation for those within to shape out of sound (music; words etc.).
Nature doesn't suggest counting, it designates oneness (whole) into ones (partial), while demanding the struggle of each partial to sustain oneself aka apartheid within wholeness.
The few suggest the inversion of that as-well...e pluribus unum (out of many; one); tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); united states; united nations, european union; equality (same) through diversity (difference) etc.
Consider perceivable math...addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being a divided partial within whole) over suggested math (counting upon zero)...
Sensing implies as perceiving (partial reaction) within perceivable (enacting whole)...each one (partial) senses everything (whole)..."nothing" is being suggested by others, who suggest rhetoric like "makes no sense" and "senseless" and also suggested terms like SENSA'TION, noun (Latin sensus, sentio, to perceive) to trick the perceiving to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
Another suggested inversion of being the temporary partial (less) within the ongoing whole (ever) aka "evertheless".
Perceivable (inspiration) represents the prime; suggested (information) represents the sub-par.