....must be controlled opposition. It's impossible for someone to be right on 99% of things but then, say, think JFK was killed by the Mafia when, everybody who's anybody, knows it was the CIA.
Also, anyone who didn't get everything spot on correct with their analysis must be as well. This of course, means that even someone who fell for the COVID scam, then came to their senses (even doing so really early in the scam) is controlled opposition.
Also, anybody who gets a lot of social media follows is clearly a sell out quisling. They should be relatively voiceless, like me, else they must be on the take like a dirty cop.
I'm never wrong, either, by the way. Which means I'm not controlled opposition.
Just wanted to clear that up for you all. Carry on.
I'm not talking about me. I know who I am and I don't care what others think. Your advice is unwanted and unwarranted. You also missed the bigger picture.
I'm talking about people here saying Tucker/Ye/Musk/Trump/Peterson/Lindell/Corbett/DeSantis and so on and so on and so on are controlled opposition in a purity spiral.
Surely some are, to one extent or another. But the standard that they use to measure who is, and who isn't, controlled opposition, is broken. Namely, that they must agree with the commentator 100%, which is impossible. Nobody agrees with anybody 100%, not even you with yourself, because you change your mind with new evidence.