a) urge (process of dying) generates resistance within urge (living).
b) being within (life) an urge (inception towards death) implies being resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
c) suggestion represents the given outlet for ones ignorance towards resisting perceivable urges.
d) the few suggest the convenience of consuming death without killing, while the consent of the many gives the few the power to withhold the killing from those who want to consume death without consequences.
This leads to killings behind anonymous walls (birth to death racketeering of life); mass consumption of death within fictitious fronts (stores; restaurants; industrialized farms) and a majority guilty of willingly ignoring need (response-ability to kill that which one consumes) for want (temptation to pay response-ability away onto others).
Now there's a parasitic few exploiting an ignorant many with choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law as the inversion of natural law, which shapes the many into followers of the directing few, while more and more consequences of ignorance have to be put behind distraction narratives, just to keep the beast system going until collapse. This shapes pressure upon every partial within the beast system...pressure to exploit each other, to flee; to justify ignorance; to blame others; to dial back in an attempt to survive a little longer; to fantasize about "building back better" and "resetting" etc.
lack of moral conviction
Consenting to suggested moralism aka suggested rules of behavior to domesticate the free will of choice of those consenting to it, gives those suggesting it the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested morals, which for example allows the criminal few to hide behind the law, while using law enforcement to a) enforce crimes against the many, while b) playing law enforcement upon the consequences of the enforced crimes.
The main distraction of suggested laws represents the temptation to ignore the ongoing momentum (balance) for judgements made after the crime already happened (imbalance). Natural law implies the motion that generates the momentum (balance) for ones free will of choice at the center aka enacting (balance) for reaction (choice)...judging the choices of others (choice vs choice) ignores balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want).
There's no lack in nature...it offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving). The "lack" of ones comprehension represents the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying), so the potential to grow is always there, even when one thinks comprehension is "lacking".
a) urge (process of dying) generates resistance within urge (living).
b) being within (life) an urge (inception towards death) implies being resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
c) suggestion represents the given outlet for ones ignorance towards resisting perceivable urges.
d) the few suggest the convenience of consuming death without killing, while the consent of the many gives the few the power to withhold the killing from those who want to consume death without consequences.
This leads to killings behind anonymous walls (birth to death racketeering of life); mass consumption of death within fictitious fronts (stores; restaurants; industrialized farms) and a majority guilty of willingly ignoring need (response-ability to kill that which one consumes) for want (temptation to pay response-ability away onto others).
Now there's a parasitic few exploiting an ignorant many with choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law as the inversion of natural law, which shapes the many into followers of the directing few, while more and more consequences of ignorance have to be put behind distraction narratives, just to keep the beast system going until collapse. This shapes pressure upon every partial within the beast system...pressure to exploit each other, to flee; to justify ignorance; to blame others; to dial back in an attempt to survive a little longer; to fantasize about "building back better" and "resetting" etc.
Consenting to suggested moralism aka suggested rules of behavior to domesticate the free will of choice of those consenting to it, gives those suggesting it the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested morals, which for example allows the criminal few to hide behind the law, while using law enforcement to a) enforce crimes against the many, while b) playing law enforcement upon the consequences of the enforced crimes.
The main distraction of suggested laws represents the temptation to ignore the ongoing momentum (balance) for judgements made after the crime already happened (imbalance). Natural law implies the motion that generates the momentum (balance) for ones free will of choice at the center aka enacting (balance) for reaction (choice)...judging the choices of others (choice vs choice) ignores balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want).
There's no lack in nature...it offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving). The "lack" of ones comprehension represents the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying), so the potential to grow is always there, even when one thinks comprehension is "lacking".