I'm not certain I would disagree with Trump on this. The truth about the JFK assassination, as I understand it, is so shocking and terrifying even for "truthers" that I can observe them subconsciously steering away from it in an act of mental and emotional--even spiritual--self-preservation.
You can add to that the extreme levels of societal division, stress, and uncertainty. Also, the vast majority of the population is psychotic, which is geometrically compounded by the fact that the entire "mental health" establishment is unable to recognize this. And every other person being drugged to the gills on one or multiple substances only amplifies all this.
All in all, you have to ask yourself a fundamental practical question, "Would revealing the truth about this right now really help our situation?" As much as I've dedicated my life to a pursuit of the truth over the last few years, and believe that the truth will be our ultimate salvation, I have to admit that few actually want the truth, and fewer still can handle it.
And if all this winds up with me saying the kind of things the Elites say, yeah, that frightens me too.
That's the main site with plenty of evidence, but in the years since I first stumbled across it, I've found much more. Also, I always compare that thesis to the analysis from any JFK researcher I happen to hear. Do they mention any of the evidence pointing towards Jackie?
Nope. When you listen closely there's a howling silence. I've concluded that probably about 80% of the high-profile JFK researchers are disinfo, and a further 15% are basing their work on the misleading research of those disinfo agents.
Beyond the whodunit, the event was clearly a public ritual murder, Satanic in nature. And you can add in that the famous Oswald assassination that was supposed to shut the lid was also hoaxed.
So whether you agree with all that or not, just fix in your mind for a moment that those things are all true. Is the public really ready for that? I personally don't think so. At least, they reject it out of hand--sometimes vehemently--when I bring even a little of it up.
And if you're saying to yourself, "That is all so ridiculous I can't even tentatively entertain it to be true for the sake of argument," then, well, you definitely get my point.
I'm not certain I would disagree with Trump on this. The truth about the JFK assassination, as I understand it, is so shocking and terrifying even for "truthers" that I can observe them subconsciously steering away from it in an act of mental and emotional--even spiritual--self-preservation.
You can add to that the extreme levels of societal division, stress, and uncertainty. Also, the vast majority of the population is psychotic, which is geometrically compounded by the fact that the entire "mental health" establishment is unable to recognize this. And every other person being drugged to the gills on one or multiple substances only amplifies all this.
All in all, you have to ask yourself a fundamental practical question, "Would revealing the truth about this right now really help our situation?" As much as I've dedicated my life to a pursuit of the truth over the last few years, and believe that the truth will be our ultimate salvation, I have to admit that few actually want the truth, and fewer still can handle it.
And if all this winds up with me saying the kind of things the Elites say, yeah, that frightens me too.
> The truth about the JFK assassination, as I understand it,
what's your take? or some links to some sites that match where you're coming from? not disparaging. genuinely curious and always looking for insights.
Jackie Killed JFK? Saying Jackie shot JFK since 2010!
That's the main site with plenty of evidence, but in the years since I first stumbled across it, I've found much more. Also, I always compare that thesis to the analysis from any JFK researcher I happen to hear. Do they mention any of the evidence pointing towards Jackie?
Nope. When you listen closely there's a howling silence. I've concluded that probably about 80% of the high-profile JFK researchers are disinfo, and a further 15% are basing their work on the misleading research of those disinfo agents.
Beyond the whodunit, the event was clearly a public ritual murder, Satanic in nature. And you can add in that the famous Oswald assassination that was supposed to shut the lid was also hoaxed.
So whether you agree with all that or not, just fix in your mind for a moment that those things are all true. Is the public really ready for that? I personally don't think so. At least, they reject it out of hand--sometimes vehemently--when I bring even a little of it up.
And if you're saying to yourself, "That is all so ridiculous I can't even tentatively entertain it to be true for the sake of argument," then, well, you definitely get my point.