-FOR'TUNE, noun [Latin fortuna] - "properly, chance; accident; luck; the arrival of something in a sudden or unexpected manner"
The many ignore that the process of dying implies an ongoing change; not an arrival but an ongoing generator, not of sudden, but of always available inspiration, and not unexpected, but always perceivable by each perceiving one within...unless willingly ignored. The few exploit that ignorance by pretending to be the house which offers fortunes to the gambling many, who are addicted to loss, while being sold the suggestion of growth. The house always wins because growth (living) within loss (process of dying) implies resisting temptations, not falling for them.
the most hated and persecuted
a) love vs hate represents wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of another.
b) those who want, want more, while those who don't want, don't want others to have. The conflict between them (reasoning) can be exploited from both sides by suggesting one side what they want (greed) while suggesting the other side to blame (envy). Meanwhile; the greed side shirks response-ability (choice) for consequences of greed (loss) onto others, while those who envy feel empowered upon persecuting those they blame; which in return represents their greed for power of others.
The greedy are turning envy and vice versa...a self perpetuating racket of suggested growth shaping perceivable (yet ignored) loss.
c) in-between love vs hate; want vs not want; least vs most operates ones free will of choice...a choice distracted from perceivable balance (need/want) to suggested imbalance (want vs not want). Reasoning about suggested represents a fictitious conflict within ignored reality, and it represents the exploitable racket for the few who gain everything the many ignore, while spending their resistance against each other.
d) PERSECU'TION, noun - "the act or practice of persecuting; the infliction of pain, punishment or death upon others unjustly"
The process of dying represents the infliction of pain; punishment and death upon everyone living within "justly" aka according to the justice which "just is". Living within the process of dying represents the opportunity to grow within the pain of loss; to learn and grow through a punished mind, and to sustain life while being moved towards death.
The many ignore both the process of dying and growing discernment about their position as the living within. The few suggest the ignorant many to hold onto (wanted growth) suggested within perceivable motion (need to resist loss), which a) drowns them faster and b) represses their expression aka reduces their resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The many are trying to grow by accumulating; while constantly losing everything they hold onto, for this they blame others. The few both suggest the many to accumulate suggested, while also suggesting those who are blamed to be persecuted; while cloaking themselves with being persecuted....reread this while adding "money" as the suggested temptation.
they control everything
The process of dying controls everything living within, those living within the process of dying represent free will of choice within the dominance of ongoing balance (momentum of motion)...free-dom aka temporary free (living) within ongoing dominance (process of dying).
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law tempts one to shirk response-ability (choice) onto others, hence ignoring the perceivable balance in control and the perceiving choice balancing within. For this "lack of control", the many blame others, while the few suggest both boogeyman to blame and themselves as those persecuted by blame.
In short...if the many ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested), then the few gain control over them by shaping the suggested (fiction) as the overlay of perceivable (reality). The many lack to comprehend this, because they are willingly ignoring perceivable for suggested.
at the same time.
Time as suggested (past; present; future) only exists within the mind of those consenting to it. Perceivable time represents the ever changing moment (um) aka the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death) for those living (choice) within.
The process of dying (sameness) generates living reactions (difference)....within its momentum aka within the balance of living/dying aka loss/growth aka whole/partial aka same/different etc.
Someone needs to solve that problem.
Every one represents a different problem (living) within the same solution (process of dying), hence in need to resist the temptation of being dissolved. Others suggest solutions to suggested problems to be outcome oriented (towards death), which tempts those who consent to ignore the need to adapt to origin (for the sustenance of life).
Suggestion (information) represents the inversion of Perception (inspiration)...only oneself can discern that, agreeing with others doesn't represent the growth of self discernment. One needs to discern the essence of being by oneself, while resisting the temptation to follow the suggestions of others.
Calling them out doesn't work
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...the internal/inherent power of energy represents loss/growth aka the momentum (balance) of energy as a self sustaining system. Everyone within represents growth (living) within loss (process of dying) aka resistance within velocity.
In short...everything works; everyone within everything works. WORK (energy) will set you FREE (free will of choice)...if only one would choose to "sweat it out" (aus-schwitz) more...
b) enacting nature represents predefined cause, reacting effects blaming each other for what's going on, tempts them to ignore the need of effect (living) to resist cause (process of dying). This represents ones struggle to grow (living) within loss (dying) aka the temporary opportunity to be within the ongoing offer.
Going to war with
Consenting to suggested conflicts (reason) against others tempts one to ignore the sustenance of self as perceiving (choice) within perceivable (balance). Choice vs choice represents imbalance in ignorance of being within balance. Choice can only exist at the center of balance, while balance can only exist at the center of motion (momentum).
Going to war with them only increases sympathy
A little sympathy for the devil?
"Please to meet you...Hope you guess my name (jew; jew)"
"But what's puzzling you...Is the nature of my game (jew; jew)"
Anyway...SYM (within) PATH (course of life) aka living within the process of dying + DEVIL, noun - " to calumniate"; from CALUMNIATE, verb - "to accuse or charge one falsely"
The former (sympathy) implies sustenance of self, while the latter (devil) tempts blaming others...that puts one at the crossroads (need/want), ready to sign the contract (choice to choice aka consent to suggested), which would nail one to the cross (want vs not want) instead of moving on (balancing as choice).
"Just as every cop is a criminal...And all the sinners saints...As heads is tails"
"Just call me Lucifer...Cause I'm in need of some restraint"
appeasing them
APPE'ASE, verb [Latin pax.] - "peace"...war vs peace represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting what another suggests. Changing sides within the conflict doesn't get one out of it, it only perpetuates the conflict.
One (choice) exists within balance (need/want)...choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) shapes imbalance (want vs not want) through the ignorance of balance.
The few rebranded the want vs not want conflicts as "reason" to the consenting many who fight each other reasoning over the suggested meaning by the few, while the few not only control both sides of every conflict of reason, they also hold the sole power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information at will for all those who are willingly reasoning about it.
There has to be a different way.
Same way (inception towards death); different choices (life). Others suggest sameness (information for accumulation) to tempt one to ignore perceivable differences (inspiration for adaptation).
To be implies different within the same way. Resisting the temptation to react alike, grows resistance within temptation.
-FOR'TUNE, noun [Latin fortuna] - "properly, chance; accident; luck; the arrival of something in a sudden or unexpected manner"
The many ignore that the process of dying implies an ongoing change; not an arrival but an ongoing generator, not of sudden, but of always available inspiration, and not unexpected, but always perceivable by each perceiving one within...unless willingly ignored. The few exploit that ignorance by pretending to be the house which offers fortunes to the gambling many, who are addicted to loss, while being sold the suggestion of growth. The house always wins because growth (living) within loss (process of dying) implies resisting temptations, not falling for them.
a) love vs hate represents wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of another.
b) those who want, want more, while those who don't want, don't want others to have. The conflict between them (reasoning) can be exploited from both sides by suggesting one side what they want (greed) while suggesting the other side to blame (envy). Meanwhile; the greed side shirks response-ability (choice) for consequences of greed (loss) onto others, while those who envy feel empowered upon persecuting those they blame; which in return represents their greed for power of others.
The greedy are turning envy and vice versa...a self perpetuating racket of suggested growth shaping perceivable (yet ignored) loss.
c) in-between love vs hate; want vs not want; least vs most operates ones free will of choice...a choice distracted from perceivable balance (need/want) to suggested imbalance (want vs not want). Reasoning about suggested represents a fictitious conflict within ignored reality, and it represents the exploitable racket for the few who gain everything the many ignore, while spending their resistance against each other.
d) PERSECU'TION, noun - "the act or practice of persecuting; the infliction of pain, punishment or death upon others unjustly"
The process of dying represents the infliction of pain; punishment and death upon everyone living within "justly" aka according to the justice which "just is". Living within the process of dying represents the opportunity to grow within the pain of loss; to learn and grow through a punished mind, and to sustain life while being moved towards death.
The many ignore both the process of dying and growing discernment about their position as the living within. The few suggest the ignorant many to hold onto (wanted growth) suggested within perceivable motion (need to resist loss), which a) drowns them faster and b) represses their expression aka reduces their resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The many are trying to grow by accumulating; while constantly losing everything they hold onto, for this they blame others. The few both suggest the many to accumulate suggested, while also suggesting those who are blamed to be persecuted; while cloaking themselves with being persecuted....reread this while adding "money" as the suggested temptation.
The process of dying controls everything living within, those living within the process of dying represent free will of choice within the dominance of ongoing balance (momentum of motion)...free-dom aka temporary free (living) within ongoing dominance (process of dying).
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law tempts one to shirk response-ability (choice) onto others, hence ignoring the perceivable balance in control and the perceiving choice balancing within. For this "lack of control", the many blame others, while the few suggest both boogeyman to blame and themselves as those persecuted by blame.
In short...if the many ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested), then the few gain control over them by shaping the suggested (fiction) as the overlay of perceivable (reality). The many lack to comprehend this, because they are willingly ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Time as suggested (past; present; future) only exists within the mind of those consenting to it. Perceivable time represents the ever changing moment (um) aka the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death) for those living (choice) within.
The process of dying (sameness) generates living reactions (difference)....within its momentum aka within the balance of living/dying aka loss/growth aka whole/partial aka same/different etc.
Every one represents a different problem (living) within the same solution (process of dying), hence in need to resist the temptation of being dissolved. Others suggest solutions to suggested problems to be outcome oriented (towards death), which tempts those who consent to ignore the need to adapt to origin (for the sustenance of life).
Suggestion (information) represents the inversion of Perception (inspiration)...only oneself can discern that, agreeing with others doesn't represent the growth of self discernment. One needs to discern the essence of being by oneself, while resisting the temptation to follow the suggestions of others.
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...the internal/inherent power of energy represents loss/growth aka the momentum (balance) of energy as a self sustaining system. Everyone within represents growth (living) within loss (process of dying) aka resistance within velocity.
In short...everything works; everyone within everything works. WORK (energy) will set you FREE (free will of choice)...if only one would choose to "sweat it out" (aus-schwitz) more...
b) enacting nature represents predefined cause, reacting effects blaming each other for what's going on, tempts them to ignore the need of effect (living) to resist cause (process of dying). This represents ones struggle to grow (living) within loss (dying) aka the temporary opportunity to be within the ongoing offer.
Consenting to suggested conflicts (reason) against others tempts one to ignore the sustenance of self as perceiving (choice) within perceivable (balance). Choice vs choice represents imbalance in ignorance of being within balance. Choice can only exist at the center of balance, while balance can only exist at the center of motion (momentum).
A little sympathy for the devil?
"Please to meet you...Hope you guess my name (jew; jew)"
"But what's puzzling you...Is the nature of my game (jew; jew)"
Anyway...SYM (within) PATH (course of life) aka living within the process of dying + DEVIL, noun - " to calumniate"; from CALUMNIATE, verb - "to accuse or charge one falsely"
The former (sympathy) implies sustenance of self, while the latter (devil) tempts blaming others...that puts one at the crossroads (need/want), ready to sign the contract (choice to choice aka consent to suggested), which would nail one to the cross (want vs not want) instead of moving on (balancing as choice).
"Just as every cop is a criminal...And all the sinners saints...As heads is tails"
"Just call me Lucifer...Cause I'm in need of some restraint"
APPE'ASE, verb [Latin pax.] - "peace"...war vs peace represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting what another suggests. Changing sides within the conflict doesn't get one out of it, it only perpetuates the conflict.
One (choice) exists within balance (need/want)...choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) shapes imbalance (want vs not want) through the ignorance of balance.
The few rebranded the want vs not want conflicts as "reason" to the consenting many who fight each other reasoning over the suggested meaning by the few, while the few not only control both sides of every conflict of reason, they also hold the sole power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information at will for all those who are willingly reasoning about it.
Same way (inception towards death); different choices (life). Others suggest sameness (information for accumulation) to tempt one to ignore perceivable differences (inspiration for adaptation).
To be implies different within the same way. Resisting the temptation to react alike, grows resistance within temptation.