Yes I’ve noticed this also and it saddens me, the guy runs out of arguments very quickly and it quickly just turns into nonsense and name calling, you can already see him doing it in this thread lol.
He loves doing the classic divide and conquer technique, splitting up what you said into individual sentences and then responding to each. That in tandem with his abrasive mis-quoting is an effective “shilling” tactic to get you to reply. It’s sad that some don’t see through it, but Im not surprised. He’s eloquent when / where he needs to be to cover his ass and manipulate others.
That’s literally not what divide and conquer is, you fucking flat earth imbecile. If you don’t want every sentence of your post replied to, stop having every sentence be wrong.
Fun fact: when I provide a citation for what I say and the faggot paid shill who replies doesn’t, I don’t have to say anything else. That’s not how arguments work. I am under no obligation to say anything else.
Explain why you think people who refuse to prove their own claims deserve a platform.
Yes I’ve noticed this also and it saddens me, the guy runs out of arguments very quickly and it quickly just turns into nonsense and name calling, you can already see him doing it in this thread lol.
He loves doing the classic divide and conquer technique, splitting up what you said into individual sentences and then responding to each. That in tandem with his abrasive mis-quoting is an effective “shilling” tactic to get you to reply. It’s sad that some don’t see through it, but Im not surprised. He’s eloquent when / where he needs to be to cover his ass and manipulate others.
It’s cute to see all the autistic cowards come together to have a circle jerk of lies.
That’s literally not what divide and conquer is, you fucking flat earth imbecile. If you don’t want every sentence of your post replied to, stop having every sentence be wrong.
No.
Fun fact: when I provide a citation for what I say and the faggot paid shill who replies doesn’t, I don’t have to say anything else. That’s not how arguments work. I am under no obligation to say anything else.
Explain why you think people who refuse to prove their own claims deserve a platform.