a) what if nature sets apart sound (perceivable) and resonance (perceiving) as to be able to communicate inspiration for adaptation?
b) what if others suggest information to tempt one (singular) to compose (plural), hence to accumulate debt of information?
Ayh tend to focus on the technology
TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Greek. art, and word or discourse.] - "a description of arts; or a treatise on the arts" aka artificial suggestion to tempt one to ignore naturally perceivable.
use "ayh" for "I"
"Ayh am whatever jew say ayh am; because if ayh wasn't, then why would ayh say ayh am?"
to subtly condition those who hate
The condition of love (want) vs hate (not want) implies ignorance of being choice within balance (need/want). One doesn't need to love or hate breathing; thirst or hunger, one needs to adapt to motion, while being tempted with emotions.
distrust
Same trick...trust vs distrust represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting the suggestion of another; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
redirect my efforts
What if RE (response to) DIRECT (being directed by) represents the effort of adaptation as reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) aka the struggle to resist temptation?
Want of suggested outcome tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
a social network so perfect
a) comprehension represents the network of one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable). It's ones comprehension that spreads out from center into the surrounding like the roots of a seed into soil.
b) suggested society (togetherness) tempts "one" to ignore perceivable apartheid aka being partial (living) within whole (process of dying); hence struggling to sustain apart while being dissolved back to base whole.
The few suggest the many to be "social animals"; yet animation (enacting) sets itself apart (reaction). Each one of the many represents a partial reaction (form) within the momentum (balance) of the enacting whole (flow).
c) perfection (whole) self differentiates into imperfection (partial) aka from loss (process of dying) into growth (living).
The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to seek outcomes (perfection), while ignoring to sustain self (imperfection). The rhetoric used goes "seeking order out of chaos"...an inversion of being temporary chaos (living) struggling to sustain self momentarily (momentum aka the ever changing moment) within the ongoing natural order (process of dying).
where free-will-of-choice has no downvote button
a) that would imply restricting the choices of others to not fall for suggested temptation...up vs down-vote aka agreement vs disagreement aka wanting vs not wanting suggested information.
For oneself that represents ignoring to express self (need) for repressing others (want).
Furthermore; one needs to resist the temptation to consent to suggested voting; while simultaneously resist both those who voted for or against oneself. Only if one resists temptation (suggested) can one grow within inspiration (perceivable).
b) the few suggest buttons to push to tempt the many to ignore the perceivable origin of being (life) pushed by (inception towards death) aka impression (loss) for expression (growth)...ones choice in-between represents compression (comprehension) of impressing (perceivable inspiration) for expression (growth potential).
Sleight of hand (Madonna - "Push")...
"Every move I make (to see the other point of view)"..."Every step I take (when there's nothing else to do)"
"Every thing I do (I think I know it all)"..."It's all because you push me"
That was written from the perspective of the living about the process of dying, and then neatly clothed in allegory; symbolism and much audio-visual spectacle suggested repeatedly (frequency of suggestion aimed at frequency of resistance)...hence mimicking the perceivable push by pushing others with suggested temptation.
a) what if nature sets apart sound (perceivable) and resonance (perceiving) as to be able to communicate inspiration for adaptation?
b) what if others suggest information to tempt one (singular) to compose (plural), hence to accumulate debt of information?
TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Greek. art, and word or discourse.] - "a description of arts; or a treatise on the arts" aka artificial suggestion to tempt one to ignore naturally perceivable.
"Ayh am whatever jew say ayh am; because if ayh wasn't, then why would ayh say ayh am?"
The condition of love (want) vs hate (not want) implies ignorance of being choice within balance (need/want). One doesn't need to love or hate breathing; thirst or hunger, one needs to adapt to motion, while being tempted with emotions.
Same trick...trust vs distrust represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting the suggestion of another; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
What if RE (response to) DIRECT (being directed by) represents the effort of adaptation as reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) aka the struggle to resist temptation?
i have a dream, of a social network so perfect where free-will-of-choice has no downvote button on his posts
Want of suggested outcome tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
a) comprehension represents the network of one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable). It's ones comprehension that spreads out from center into the surrounding like the roots of a seed into soil.
b) suggested society (togetherness) tempts "one" to ignore perceivable apartheid aka being partial (living) within whole (process of dying); hence struggling to sustain apart while being dissolved back to base whole.
The few suggest the many to be "social animals"; yet animation (enacting) sets itself apart (reaction). Each one of the many represents a partial reaction (form) within the momentum (balance) of the enacting whole (flow).
c) perfection (whole) self differentiates into imperfection (partial) aka from loss (process of dying) into growth (living).
The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to seek outcomes (perfection), while ignoring to sustain self (imperfection). The rhetoric used goes "seeking order out of chaos"...an inversion of being temporary chaos (living) struggling to sustain self momentarily (momentum aka the ever changing moment) within the ongoing natural order (process of dying).
a) that would imply restricting the choices of others to not fall for suggested temptation...up vs down-vote aka agreement vs disagreement aka wanting vs not wanting suggested information.
For oneself that represents ignoring to express self (need) for repressing others (want).
Furthermore; one needs to resist the temptation to consent to suggested voting; while simultaneously resist both those who voted for or against oneself. Only if one resists temptation (suggested) can one grow within inspiration (perceivable).
b) the few suggest buttons to push to tempt the many to ignore the perceivable origin of being (life) pushed by (inception towards death) aka impression (loss) for expression (growth)...ones choice in-between represents compression (comprehension) of impressing (perceivable inspiration) for expression (growth potential).
Sleight of hand (Madonna - "Push")...
"Every move I make (to see the other point of view)"..."Every step I take (when there's nothing else to do)"
"Every thing I do (I think I know it all)"..."It's all because you push me"
That was written from the perspective of the living about the process of dying, and then neatly clothed in allegory; symbolism and much audio-visual spectacle suggested repeatedly (frequency of suggestion aimed at frequency of resistance)...hence mimicking the perceivable push by pushing others with suggested temptation.