My dude, if you have two main oarties to vote for it is only natural according to statisticsJust like sex distribution. Offer more choice and you may see a different picture.
Go back to any election time in the past and see that no party will ever have won with more than 10% difference at most. At most
There's a divide and conquer element embedded in the entire psychological operation we call "democracy."
If you still believe elections are real, that the electronic voting machines accurately tally votes, that voter registration databases are true and honest, and that absentee ballots are all authentic and genuinely cast then you can't even consider this hypothesis yet.
Just the fact that all democracies around the world have been whittled down to only two parties should also clue you in that this is designed this way on purpose. It didn't happen by accident. Politics are not binary.
Why is it impossible? It's statistically plausible
My dude, if you have two main oarties to vote for it is only natural according to statisticsJust like sex distribution. Offer more choice and you may see a different picture.
Go back to any election time in the past and see that no party will ever have won with more than 10% difference at most. At most
That's the point. The results are not organic.
Everything is war gamed to a 50/50 split.
There's a divide and conquer element embedded in the entire psychological operation we call "democracy."
If you still believe elections are real, that the electronic voting machines accurately tally votes, that voter registration databases are true and honest, and that absentee ballots are all authentic and genuinely cast then you can't even consider this hypothesis yet.
Just the fact that all democracies around the world have been whittled down to only two parties should also clue you in that this is designed this way on purpose. It didn't happen by accident. Politics are not binary.
Well said.