heliocentric model doesnt explain how the star trails stay in perfect circle, dispite our orbital path moving on multiple axises
Yes it does. Stars are ridiculously far away so they don't appear to move, like looking at the sun or moon out of a moving car.
its just an agreed upon average rate of accepration)
In which direction? All of the air affected by gravity accelerates in which direction?
why the south pole doesnt have similar summer to the north pole,
Different geography and weather systems cause different weather. The ocean and air currents in the Atlantic give Europe a much warmer climate than the equivalent latitude (do you believe in latitude? or weather?) in North America or even Russia.
why the noth pole has a 24 hour sun, while the south pole doesnt.
Sounds made up, but if it's true it's easily explainable by orbital mechanics. All it would take is an orbit slightly "South" of the sun and you wouldn't get 24 hour sun on the South pole, even with the tilt.
Anyway, not that this hasn't been fun, but is the irony that you have completely failed to explain the theory which you claim to have spent years "researching" while simultaneously attacking another theory for not explaining "everything" completely lost on you?
Is it possible that you simply don't understand physics or astronomy? Your whole argument seems to hinge in the fact that you don't think the heliocentric model works; do you even understand it? I'm not an astrophysicist or anything and I can answer half your questions off the top of my head.
Does FE explain anything I just did? How does the North Pole have a 24 hour sun on FE at all? Some kind of spiral orbit that reverses at the end of the year? How is that supposed to work? How is there any day light in the southern "ring" while the sun is directly over the North pole? Does the opacity of the atmosphere change over the year? And if that's true, how do the stars appear the same?
Maybe you should have spent those years studying actual reality instead of crackpot youtube videos?
Yes it does. Stars are ridiculously far away so they don't appear to move, like looking at the sun or moon out of a moving car.
In which direction? All of the air affected by gravity accelerates in which direction?
Different geography and weather systems cause different weather. The ocean and air currents in the Atlantic give Europe a much warmer climate than the equivalent latitude (do you believe in latitude? or weather?) in North America or even Russia.
Sounds made up, but if it's true it's easily explainable by orbital mechanics. All it would take is an orbit slightly "South" of the sun and you wouldn't get 24 hour sun on the South pole, even with the tilt.
Anyway, not that this hasn't been fun, but is the irony that you have completely failed to explain the theory which you claim to have spent years "researching" while simultaneously attacking another theory for not explaining "everything" completely lost on you?
Is it possible that you simply don't understand physics or astronomy? Your whole argument seems to hinge in the fact that you don't think the heliocentric model works; do you even understand it? I'm not an astrophysicist or anything and I can answer half your questions off the top of my head.
Does FE explain anything I just did? How does the North Pole have a 24 hour sun on FE at all? Some kind of spiral orbit that reverses at the end of the year? How is that supposed to work? How is there any day light in the southern "ring" while the sun is directly over the North pole? Does the opacity of the atmosphere change over the year? And if that's true, how do the stars appear the same?
Maybe you should have spent those years studying actual reality instead of crackpot youtube videos?