Realistically you can't have a truly secure election unless every vote is tied directly to a unique I.D. and a lot of different people/groups have access to that database to verify the authenticity of each I.D. and vote (as opposed to trusting a small group of people to tell everyone that every vote was for sure legit trust us guys), or in other words you can't guarantee security of elections and guarantee strong anonymity at the same time. So you understand the dilemma. This isn't something that most people on the right are ready to talk about since naturally there is intense and justified wariness towards the idea of not having strong voter privacy let alone having a big database that tracks everyone's political choices. Yet without such a database and many different groups eyes on it, how else are you going to make sure it's 1 vote per living legal citizen.
Realistically you can't have a truly secure election unless every vote is tied directly to a unique I.D. and a lot of different people/groups have access to that database to verify the authenticity of each I.D. and vote (as opposed to trusting a small group of people to tell everyone that every vote was for sure legit trust us guys), or in other words you can't guarantee security of elections and guarantee strong anonymity at the same time. So you understand the dilemma. This isn't something that most people on the right are ready to talk about since naturally there is intense and justified wariness towards the idea of not having strong voter privacy let alone having a big database that tracks everyone's political choices. Yet without such a database and many different groups eyes on it, how else are you going to make sure it's 1 vote per living legal citizen.