Not yet in any event. But to suggest they won't, begs the questions of why have them. They're a deterrent. Except they haven't deterred if there are increasingly sustained losses and territory held capitulates. Defense breached and threatened at further costs.
It's largely that they're still not needed. And any reaction to their use provokes more risk.
However, I really don't buy into this propaganda. It has another narrative often of blame and denial. Yawn. It of course is the same constant insults. Tit for tat.
The fact they're talking about them means they're an option. Not a dismissal. It means that idea is entertained, and being prepared for. But will it?
Not yet in any event. But to suggest they won't, begs the questions of why have them. They're a deterrent. Except they haven't deterred if there are increasingly sustained losses and territory held capitulates. Defense breached and threatened at further costs.
It's largely that they're still not needed. And any reaction to their use provokes more risk.
However, I really don't buy into this propaganda. It has another narrative often of blame and denial. Yawn. It of course is the same constant insults. Tit for tat.
The fact they're talking about them means they're an option. Not a dismissal. It means that idea is entertained, and being prepared for. But will it?