RE (response to) PLACE (habitat within) MENT (mind; memory)
a) being able to react implies being within enacting, hence a reaction within generation.
b) habitation within enacting implies being a temporary reaction (partial) within an ongoing system (whole).
c) memory operates within the momentum of temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying); hence allowing the wiggle room for choice to be used within balance. Choice requires memory to make a distinction between reaction to enacting and the consequences thereof as to be able to be inspired or tempted by it. Otherwise choice couldn't be used to grow (living) within loss (process of dying).
tl; dr...the only replacement for one (partial) within oneness (whole) represents another different one (partial) of the same oneness (whole). The status quo of partials transmuted out of whole implies constant replacement.
How is it that most get all exited about IN-OUT-IN-OUT...when it comes to intercourse, but IN (inception) OUT (death) IN (inception) OUT (death)...is scaring the shit out of them?
You're drooling on your keyboard. Not going to happen.
There is nothing nefarious about natural population decline, it is a good thing for everyone in the long run.
In nature, populations expand and decline based on resources.
What is evil is using eugenics or other means to purposefully do it.
Deagel and the guidestones playing out.
Nothing to see here.
Hey, look at what Musk and West are up to!
a) being able to react implies being within enacting, hence a reaction within generation.
b) habitation within enacting implies being a temporary reaction (partial) within an ongoing system (whole).
c) memory operates within the momentum of temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying); hence allowing the wiggle room for choice to be used within balance. Choice requires memory to make a distinction between reaction to enacting and the consequences thereof as to be able to be inspired or tempted by it. Otherwise choice couldn't be used to grow (living) within loss (process of dying).
tl; dr...the only replacement for one (partial) within oneness (whole) represents another different one (partial) of the same oneness (whole). The status quo of partials transmuted out of whole implies constant replacement.
How is it that most get all exited about IN-OUT-IN-OUT...when it comes to intercourse, but IN (inception) OUT (death) IN (inception) OUT (death)...is scaring the shit out of them?