You're insane. Relocation from war zones is standard military operation. Kids in these zones are often put up for adoption because they've been orphaned.
WW2 you remember WW2. They sent British kids to Australia and Canada to escape the Blitz. They sent them to state orphanages. They had them work in the factories.
Wars at home do this otherwise it is the conflict job to adhere to relocation. When it's its own population they do so without questions.
But again Iraq and Syria and Afghanistan there was constant relocation and refugee programs, orphaned children were provided passage.
Study something. But you don't, you read propaganda. He said they said bullshit. There might be crime it's war. But otherwise relocation is a fact.
The kids were abused. In both Canada and Australia so I guess it's not the same. The kids got sent to State run orphanages with pedos abusing them. Some were put up for adoption with pedos. WW2. They had no real law on child marriage then, sure it got moved to 15 in 1945, but not for the orphans. You shouldn't open your mouth. That history was pretty grim, the UK government had to pay them compensation. But it happened then. Look it up.
How is Russia abducting anybody. It had a referendum where the people it's relocating became Russian citizens.
Checkmate. But I'm not playing. I don't buy bullshit. Because I can link Ukraine shit too. Those refugees. It's a really stupid argument to get into. It is pointless there's a war. You're spouting first grade propaganda and it's otherwise ridiculous unless you have facts. There are heinous crimes on both sides. Choosing one or the other is redundant in war. Unless you're fighting it?
Provide a comparable example then.
WW2 you remember WW2. They sent British kids to Australia and Canada to escape the Blitz. They sent them to state orphanages. They had them work in the factories.
Wars at home do this otherwise it is the conflict job to adhere to relocation. When it's its own population they do so without questions.
But again Iraq and Syria and Afghanistan there was constant relocation and refugee programs, orphaned children were provided passage.
Study something. But you don't, you read propaganda. He said they said bullshit. There might be crime it's war. But otherwise relocation is a fact.
Great examples. Sending kids from one commonwealth nation to another.
As opposed to Russia abducting kids from Ukraine and getting Russians to adopt them.
Totally the same!
I just love how you retard played yoyrself.
The kids were abused. In both Canada and Australia so I guess it's not the same. The kids got sent to State run orphanages with pedos abusing them. Some were put up for adoption with pedos. WW2. They had no real law on child marriage then, sure it got moved to 15 in 1945, but not for the orphans. You shouldn't open your mouth. That history was pretty grim, the UK government had to pay them compensation. But it happened then. Look it up.
How is Russia abducting anybody. It had a referendum where the people it's relocating became Russian citizens.
Checkmate. But I'm not playing. I don't buy bullshit. Because I can link Ukraine shit too. Those refugees. It's a really stupid argument to get into. It is pointless there's a war. You're spouting first grade propaganda and it's otherwise ridiculous unless you have facts. There are heinous crimes on both sides. Choosing one or the other is redundant in war. Unless you're fighting it?
Oh lordy so your example makes your justification even worse.
Do you even think before you write?
They are taking Ukrainian children and moving them to Russia.
English, do you speak it?