Anti-missle systems are pretty bullshitty in general, aren't they(?)
Yes. None guarantee 100% protection. Nobody botherd to spent money on inventing some force shields or deflectors. But there is difference between 90% protection and 50% protection, f.e.
We have a pretty big air force too
And here comes anti-aircraft defence, where Russia have priority over US too.
So, we have cool attacking power without decent protection against the other side with cool protection without decent attacking power. Who will win? Really I don't want to check this out in practice.
With all that efforts and money spent on endless weapon race we could create paradise here and occupy half of Solar System already.
Yes. None guarantee 100% protection. Nobody botherd to spent money on inventing some force shields or deflectors. But there is difference between 90% protection and 50% protection, f.e.
And here comes anti-aircraft defence, where Russia have priority over US too.
So, we have cool attacking power without decent protection against the other side with cool protection without decent attacking power. Who will win? Really I don't want to check this out in practice.
With all that efforts and money spent on endless weapon race we could create paradise here and occupy half of Solar System already.