Incorrect. The original claim is that these emails are real, with no proof given. Doesn't matter what I say after that, burden of proof still lies on the one making the positive claim.
And saying they haven't retracted anything means jack shit. Have the "fact checkers" for the msm retracted anything? No? That must mean they're telling the truth! You're an npc just like the liberals, only fed a different pack of lies.
Im sure that was just a euphemism. Haha!
Yes, chicken is a euphemism gays use to refer to young boys.
Oh great. Now they're Arkaniciding poor chickens. What is this world coming to!
She works for the rothschilds. The rothy's are satan's oldest and most best friend.
That "email" is totally fake.
proof?
You've got it backwards. Where's the proof this email is totally legit?
You made the claim Fishyman, onus is on you to prove your point.
Has wikileaks ever retracted anything?
Incorrect. The original claim is that these emails are real, with no proof given. Doesn't matter what I say after that, burden of proof still lies on the one making the positive claim.
Claim is still on wikileaks, source provided.
Wikileaks has never retracted anything.
Draw your own conclusions.
Good talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOVbAmknKUk
That's their source.
And saying they haven't retracted anything means jack shit. Have the "fact checkers" for the msm retracted anything? No? That must mean they're telling the truth! You're an npc just like the liberals, only fed a different pack of lies.
lol, touch grass nerd
RFC19 headers you fuckin retard. They prove the email is real.
I bet you also think the Bible is proof the Bible is real.