Practice 30 moon landings with a simulator.
Change the gravity setting and successfully do it on the 31st try.
When Neil Armstrong did it, the final approach and landing were done "by the seat of your pants" --- there was no computer used. The de-orbit burn did use a primitive computer. The final approach and landing did not use a computer.
The craft was not flying (no air), it was translating.
There was no aerodynamic stability. - The was no aerodynamics.
When you successfully do it, post a screenshot. :)
Your quote is so small you ignored the references to the very things you mention.
So again, is underwater movement also flying?
Translation involves moving your location, flying is just a term we associate to air movement but it does not require such forces, as I have already given all that is required to be determined flying.
In other words, if you are piloting a craft and you are in control of vectoring or velocity, you are flying if what you are traverse through is below water resistance. Regardless of what forces work against you.
https://youtu.be/cU6EhQRQGVw?t=10
As you cannot tell I have been just yanking your chain shit for brains.
Moon landing shit is bullshit, using a fucking piece of software on your computer is no comparison, it is clearly based on the claims we make and the information we 'simulate' which is not even close to all of it, surely you are not stupid enough to actually think you have any logic in this plan.
I am still on the fence.
I have factored out things to make the landing possible
I have factored out things to make the hoax possible
It still comes down to the skill required to make the final approach and landing possible with what NASA had at the time.
Here's the rub --- It would be easy to simulate. The (easy version) simulators I have tried are next to impossible. I am a pilot. I have test flown experimental (never been built before) home-brew aircraft. I have landed some with control reversal. I consider myself an amateur test pilot.
...but fuck -- the lunar seat-of-your-pants landing is hard for me to believe.
So --- I present the Neil Armstrong lunar lander challenge --- still no takers
Well, The only thing that could put me on the fence, would be to suggest that the magnetic field was so strong back then, that it repelled all concerning radiation and the boys were able to fly there with safety. I figure this is extremely unlikely.
When it comes to wanting to compare apples to oranges, I find this hard to do.
I am a driver, anything I have ever piloted and had control of, I become part of. So I understand the ability to manipulate a machine using your own senses.
But, I am not sure I could pull this off in space with this craft on the first sojourn. Technically maybe all his 0 gravity flight training helped. I have only done that in video games.
For the expedition to complete flawlessly 6 times in 3 years, I find it amazing, unbelievably amazing.
Spread my Wing's and..
Gahhhh...
hahahah, awesome.