Did I get that right?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
If the price is the defeat snd humiliation of Russia I am willing to pay.
Russia still hasn't answered for the scourge of Communism it unleashed on the world and the decades of brutal subjugation of many nations and peoples.
Fuck Russia.
Yawn. You missed the point. It won't be defeated at home. It hasn't been historically.
Only somehow you fucking think today you're gonna beat a nuclear power. It hasn't been defeated at home. Napoleon, WW1, WW2. Ottomans before napoleon. But today you're gonna beat a nuclear power at home.
You're batshit crazy. Literally insane.
Somehow you thought it wasn't Russia. It was this other proxy, we will haha convince it, it isn't Russia. Until if he nuked, simple win, what would you even do? You'd blow up the entire planet? Literally crazy.
No game plan, here. Wait until it nukes then what? No, what. Provoke Russia to nuke because you aren't endangering far more far more. Your stupid games. No what.
If it wasn't armed would people get killed. But it must be funny Russians killing Russians. Until what?
Are you drunk? That reads like a drunken rant.
Then again, fucking Russkies like to drink early.
No, historically Russia haven't lost at home in war.
They withdrew from the Cold War, it wasn't that kind of warfare. They lost to Japan at sea, over disputed Islands, they now possess. Afghanistan wasn't at home. Neither was the Cold War on that battlefront.
But at home they haven't lost historically. In centuries. But there is perhaps Finland. It was a completely different dispute and conflict. Hardly the same comparison. Wasn't it easier to create a larger buffer there. While Finland remained neutral?
Today you're drunk on a conclusion they will. Without realising they haven't. But importantly without asking the question how does a nuclear power lose?
The only deal that can be made Russia will have gained territory. Any mobilisation can historically fight for years, a nation committing to its war machine, supply, conscript, production, with the increasing risk this conflict goes nuclear.
I am emphatically not a Russian. Just somebody concerned. I am asking what is the result? Stating this conflict can drag for years. Look at them recently. Or it can go nuclear sooner. Or peace can be made, but at what costs? Look at those costs adding up. As that cost prompts more risk on what course. Who knows? Except you seem to think something else.
Ashkenazis are responsible for communism. Not Russians.