I was not able to contain myself for your entire rant. Lost me at some point after Russia is losing and has been for x.
Seriously. You are severely misinformed on reality.
You cannot comprehend the losses and what is even lost.
This is how war is done. To and fro. Russia has by far wiped out way more equipment and manpower and that son is where the reality sinks in.
Russia has completely dominated the battlefield since day one. Each and every inch of retreated land costs Ukraine irreplaceably realize full well they have no remaining war machine. Completely destroyed. The only thing they can do is rely on items shipped to them. From people far away.
Escalating this from the current small time operation with limited deployment capability will result in the final death throes of NATO.
The only people that think Russia will nuke is the talking heads that want to plant a dirty bomb and blame Russia. Lol. Ridiculous.
If Russia nukes. It will nuke the air craft carriers. And maybe Britain and Germany. Possibly France Canada and USA. But not Ukraine.
It's not a rant. I was repeating the News. They've had a number of former military heads suggesting a tactical nuke could be deployed, and it could be deployed if Ukraine forces a major Russian retreat in the territories that had a referendum. Where Ukraine has made massive advances recently. Currently what caused this coverage is the Ukrainian counter offensive potentially surrounding a force of about 15,000 Russians near Kherson. Meanwhile didn't the general just promoted call for nukes as Lyman changed hands. It of course is a major hub and on the main highway going south in the territory of Russian referendum.
The same propaganda as it has from the start of this war's coverage, stated, Russia is losing. Etc. Ukraine must force every Russian out of their country. The West stating it doesn't recognise sham referendums, and it is supporting Ukraine to that conclusion of forcing Russian retreat. The same news through multiple stations is also through various former military personnel, stating, a nuke could otherwise occur.
No, Russia won't lose, I never said it would, and not if it has nukes. It's not planning to lose if it has partially mobilised. It is stll at war and more committed to it, through those referendums.
No, Russia isn't in full control of the battlefield, and if it has mobilised. Yes, war often goes back and forth, and Russa is still technically superior on the battle field.
This war will drag, and as it does, it escalates.
But the point is it remains probable, and if Ukraine forces a major Russian retreat in the territory under referendums. The likelihood of Russia deploying a tactical nuke to defend its sovereignty, defending areas under Russian referendum remains an escalating outcome.
This obviously causes a concern. The West is supporting the complete withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine. It doesn't even recognise the Crimea. But at the same time the risk of nukes becoming deployed remain high if Ukraine causes Russian retreat.
A) Ukraine will be defeated
B) A nuke is deployed because Russia cannot defend its territory.
C) Peace is made.
Take your pick. In either event no wonder he, the topic, wants to pre-empt. Peace means Ukraine has been defeated. Otherwise it has lost more territory. Seriously what?
Lol. Smoke another one.
I was not able to contain myself for your entire rant. Lost me at some point after Russia is losing and has been for x.
Seriously. You are severely misinformed on reality. You cannot comprehend the losses and what is even lost.
This is how war is done. To and fro. Russia has by far wiped out way more equipment and manpower and that son is where the reality sinks in.
Russia has completely dominated the battlefield since day one. Each and every inch of retreated land costs Ukraine irreplaceably realize full well they have no remaining war machine. Completely destroyed. The only thing they can do is rely on items shipped to them. From people far away.
Escalating this from the current small time operation with limited deployment capability will result in the final death throes of NATO.
The only people that think Russia will nuke is the talking heads that want to plant a dirty bomb and blame Russia. Lol. Ridiculous.
If Russia nukes. It will nuke the air craft carriers. And maybe Britain and Germany. Possibly France Canada and USA. But not Ukraine.
It's not a rant. I was repeating the News. They've had a number of former military heads suggesting a tactical nuke could be deployed, and it could be deployed if Ukraine forces a major Russian retreat in the territories that had a referendum. Where Ukraine has made massive advances recently. Currently what caused this coverage is the Ukrainian counter offensive potentially surrounding a force of about 15,000 Russians near Kherson. Meanwhile didn't the general just promoted call for nukes as Lyman changed hands. It of course is a major hub and on the main highway going south in the territory of Russian referendum.
The same propaganda as it has from the start of this war's coverage, stated, Russia is losing. Etc. Ukraine must force every Russian out of their country. The West stating it doesn't recognise sham referendums, and it is supporting Ukraine to that conclusion of forcing Russian retreat. The same news through multiple stations is also through various former military personnel, stating, a nuke could otherwise occur.
No, Russia won't lose, I never said it would, and not if it has nukes. It's not planning to lose if it has partially mobilised. It is stll at war and more committed to it, through those referendums.
No, Russia isn't in full control of the battlefield, and if it has mobilised. Yes, war often goes back and forth, and Russa is still technically superior on the battle field.
This war will drag, and as it does, it escalates.
But the point is it remains probable, and if Ukraine forces a major Russian retreat in the territory under referendums. The likelihood of Russia deploying a tactical nuke to defend its sovereignty, defending areas under Russian referendum remains an escalating outcome.
This obviously causes a concern. The West is supporting the complete withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine. It doesn't even recognise the Crimea. But at the same time the risk of nukes becoming deployed remain high if Ukraine causes Russian retreat.
A) Ukraine will be defeated
B) A nuke is deployed because Russia cannot defend its territory.
C) Peace is made.
Take your pick. In either event no wonder he, the topic, wants to pre-empt. Peace means Ukraine has been defeated. Otherwise it has lost more territory. Seriously what?