a) the foundation of "where" for every partial (living) represents the momentum of whole (process of dying).
b) the momentum (balance) of partial (growth) and whole (loss) represents the internal power of EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.]
c) every BODY (material substance within animation) exists within work (energy) aka as a partial of the whole.
d) suggested websites tempt one to move along a web instead of branching out (comprehension) into perceivable from the perceiving center. The suggested world wide web tries to mimic the whole as to lure the partial from center.
e) one doesn't need a place where others suggest something; one needs to grow comprehension about everything perceivable representing inspiration (need) to grow further or temptation (want) to restrict growth.
outside of comments
Notice the post score (0)...I resist the temptation to suggest information; hence only adapting to perceivable inspiration aka as the partial inside to the whole outside...not to others making suggestions within.
an extremely niche part
a) being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) represents the only one part one can be.
b) NICHE, noun - "hollow; empty space" is what the few suggest to tempt the many to ignore SPACE, noun (Latin spatium; spatior, to wander) + A'LIEN, adjective (Latin alienus, from alius, another) aka one being able to wander among other ones as partials within whole....that ain't empty; but filled to the brim.
of the internet
A NET represents a "cunning device" aka trying to catch you; while INTER aka internal implies already being within. The process of dying doesn't try to catch the living; it generates (loss) them as reactions (growth).
where people are NOT upvoting your ideas in mass?
a) agreement (upvote) vs disagreement (downvote) over suggested information tempts one to ignore the need adaptation to perceivable inspiration. It's ones response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
b) the praises and insults suggested inspired me to comprehend that as choice one needs to struggle within balance (need/want); while resisting suggested imbalance (want vs not want aka praise vs insult).
c) consenting to others putting one on a pedestal shapes those others into the pit.
d) if I would write for others; than a) I would tempt them to want more and more; b) whatever I write would become the anchor for my growth potential; since others would constantly drag me back to what I did before.
e) to be implies apartheid aka as partial within whole. The few suggest collectivism to "amass" the consenting many; hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one). Why? Because those who ignore apartheid (living) can be directed back into whole (process of dying); while until then they willingly ignore resistance, which allows exploitation of the many by the few.
tl; dr...if you resist the temptation to want from others; then you'll notice that everything is already available to you....yet; resistance requires free will of choice. Instead of collecting from outside; grow within by letting go of accumulated.
a) the foundation of "where" for every partial (living) represents the momentum of whole (process of dying).
b) the momentum (balance) of partial (growth) and whole (loss) represents the internal power of EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.]
c) every BODY (material substance within animation) exists within work (energy) aka as a partial of the whole.
d) suggested websites tempt one to move along a web instead of branching out (comprehension) into perceivable from the perceiving center. The suggested world wide web tries to mimic the whole as to lure the partial from center.
e) one doesn't need a place where others suggest something; one needs to grow comprehension about everything perceivable representing inspiration (need) to grow further or temptation (want) to restrict growth.
Notice the post score (0)...I resist the temptation to suggest information; hence only adapting to perceivable inspiration aka as the partial inside to the whole outside...not to others making suggestions within.
a) being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) represents the only one part one can be.
b) NICHE, noun - "hollow; empty space" is what the few suggest to tempt the many to ignore SPACE, noun (Latin spatium; spatior, to wander) + A'LIEN, adjective (Latin alienus, from alius, another) aka one being able to wander among other ones as partials within whole....that ain't empty; but filled to the brim.
A NET represents a "cunning device" aka trying to catch you; while INTER aka internal implies already being within. The process of dying doesn't try to catch the living; it generates (loss) them as reactions (growth).
a) agreement (upvote) vs disagreement (downvote) over suggested information tempts one to ignore the need adaptation to perceivable inspiration. It's ones response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
b) the praises and insults suggested inspired me to comprehend that as choice one needs to struggle within balance (need/want); while resisting suggested imbalance (want vs not want aka praise vs insult).
c) consenting to others putting one on a pedestal shapes those others into the pit.
d) if I would write for others; than a) I would tempt them to want more and more; b) whatever I write would become the anchor for my growth potential; since others would constantly drag me back to what I did before.
e) to be implies apartheid aka as partial within whole. The few suggest collectivism to "amass" the consenting many; hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one). Why? Because those who ignore apartheid (living) can be directed back into whole (process of dying); while until then they willingly ignore resistance, which allows exploitation of the many by the few.
tl; dr...if you resist the temptation to want from others; then you'll notice that everything is already available to you....yet; resistance requires free will of choice. Instead of collecting from outside; grow within by letting go of accumulated.
I knew you were just a bunch of hot air and nothing of substance to show.
If you knew you wouldn't suggest "nothing"; since everything perceivable is already shown.
How much more information has to be suggested before the many comprehend that perceivable inspiration offers everything to everyone at every moment?