I've concluded that the Gnostics were created to offramp people from a Christianity growing in popularity. Most of what I've heard of their doctrine is nonsense, completely without base. That is, as you read any of their material, ask yourself, "How would anyone come to know this exactly?"
That being said, I thought they were dead on with this, and the subject is key to the source and solution for almost all the problems we face. It's importance cannot be overestimated. The Dark Occultists that run this world are well aware of it and wish no one was talking about it.
The Essenes (and Jesus may have been one) were on to this long before the Gnostics. They referred to it as souls that were "asleep", "awake", and "drowsy". So when Jesus said, "Let the dead bury the dead", he was really saying it was pointless to try to wake the sleeping, and moving ahead as a wakened person was to take precedence.
My guess has long been that we have an instance of the 80/20 rule on our hands: 80% hylics, 16% psychics, 4% pneumatics. (Disappointing, I know.) The focus should be on waking psychics to become pneumatics, as the hylics may be a lost cause.
There is much, much confirming and collateral evidence for this but this comment is too long already.
A lot of the topic is still quite murky for me, but one thing I feel is fairly reliable is that virtually all humans were hylics until about 600 BC. The only exceptions were those we know as kings, high priests, and prophets (and there was a reason for that). There are many intriguing data points consistent with that idea, but here are just a couple:
If you look at ancient writings from before this period, say from the Sumerians, none of it is first person, at least none that I've ever run across. Babylonian doesn't even have a word or phrase for "thank you", because of course that is an expression of personal consciousness. From those numerous centuries, there's not a single cuneiform tablet that says something like, "Dear Ereshkigal, I like you. I want to touch your boobs. Do you want to go to the ziggurat with me?" Not a single one that I know of.
On a totally different line of evidence, check out the Axial Age. It's like humanity--or at least a small part--suddenly "woke up". You'll see they really try to play it down and smear it out, and of course steer around giving any reason for it. I've collected many, many more examples from that time period. When you look at the list all put together it is quite startling.
Something very significant, even crucial, went down at that time. If I'm right about what it was then I can see why the Elite don't want us to know about it.
Haha, I appreciate the interest! I always feel that we're next to an enormous ocean of knowledge, but They have got us looking at chicks in bikinis and the hot dog stand.
I've concluded that the Gnostics were created to offramp people from a Christianity growing in popularity. Most of what I've heard of their doctrine is nonsense, completely without base. That is, as you read any of their material, ask yourself, "How would anyone come to know this exactly?"
That being said, I thought they were dead on with this, and the subject is key to the source and solution for almost all the problems we face. It's importance cannot be overestimated. The Dark Occultists that run this world are well aware of it and wish no one was talking about it.
The Essenes (and Jesus may have been one) were on to this long before the Gnostics. They referred to it as souls that were "asleep", "awake", and "drowsy". So when Jesus said, "Let the dead bury the dead", he was really saying it was pointless to try to wake the sleeping, and moving ahead as a wakened person was to take precedence.
My guess has long been that we have an instance of the 80/20 rule on our hands: 80% hylics, 16% psychics, 4% pneumatics. (Disappointing, I know.) The focus should be on waking psychics to become pneumatics, as the hylics may be a lost cause.
There is much, much confirming and collateral evidence for this but this comment is too long already.
A lot of the topic is still quite murky for me, but one thing I feel is fairly reliable is that virtually all humans were hylics until about 600 BC. The only exceptions were those we know as kings, high priests, and prophets (and there was a reason for that). There are many intriguing data points consistent with that idea, but here are just a couple:
If you look at ancient writings from before this period, say from the Sumerians, none of it is first person, at least none that I've ever run across. Babylonian doesn't even have a word or phrase for "thank you", because of course that is an expression of personal consciousness. From those numerous centuries, there's not a single cuneiform tablet that says something like, "Dear Ereshkigal, I like you. I want to touch your boobs. Do you want to go to the ziggurat with me?" Not a single one that I know of.
On a totally different line of evidence, check out the Axial Age. It's like humanity--or at least a small part--suddenly "woke up". You'll see they really try to play it down and smear it out, and of course steer around giving any reason for it. I've collected many, many more examples from that time period. When you look at the list all put together it is quite startling.
Something very significant, even crucial, went down at that time. If I'm right about what it was then I can see why the Elite don't want us to know about it.
Subscribe. When is your next lecture please?
Haha, I appreciate the interest! I always feel that we're next to an enormous ocean of knowledge, but They have got us looking at chicks in bikinis and the hot dog stand.