Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
They respond by saying the earth is a flat, infinite plane. No edge.
So how thick is the earth? Being infinite would imply the universe is bifurcated into half earth and half air/space/waters-above-the-dome.
They respond by saying the earth is a flat, infinite plane. No edge.
See, I love this idea. It’s at least creative and funny. But “infinite flat plane” is intriguing as a thought experiment. Think of all the lands we could conquer. How civilizations would grow and develop…
How would the gravity problem be solved? Assume “half land, half sky” (and ignore how masses behave under pressure) and you would have infinite mass pulling you in every (2D) direction at once, as well as straight down. Would that, then, “cancel out” and result in the “equivalence” of being pulled straight down to the (perfectly flat) ground? But then we have to address the behavior of masses under pressure (I’ve seen them say that Earth is “flat and hollow to get around this) and how an infinite plane Earth, even if it was only of a finite thickness, would still collapse into a singularity.
You should clean this up....you have some stupid arguments in here.
Don't fight stupid with stupid.
How about you provide some reasoning yourself....also you too make poor assumptions. Not as poor as the FE people but you have some serious issues.
You definitions of gravity and mass are obviously not independent.....etc...
Logically your arguments are not all true....so the entire thing is just an OR which is is not good for proofs.....
Lol.
---- let me clarify.
If you are arguing for something....you need to use those assumptions....if you are arguing against something....you have to use their assumptions.....
Got it....
You and the FE people cannot seem to separate out your assumptions.....geez
Cool, thanks for admitting that the earth isn’t flat and that you have nothing to add here. Fuck off, you worthless well poisoning sack of shit. You won’t discredit real conspiracies with this garbage.
Burn in hell, flatty.
They respond by saying the earth is a flat, infinite plane. No edge.
So how thick is the earth? Being infinite would imply the universe is bifurcated into half earth and half air/space/waters-above-the-dome.
See, I love this idea. It’s at least creative and funny. But “infinite flat plane” is intriguing as a thought experiment. Think of all the lands we could conquer. How civilizations would grow and develop…
How would the gravity problem be solved? Assume “half land, half sky” (and ignore how masses behave under pressure) and you would have infinite mass pulling you in every (2D) direction at once, as well as straight down. Would that, then, “cancel out” and result in the “equivalence” of being pulled straight down to the (perfectly flat) ground? But then we have to address the behavior of masses under pressure (I’ve seen them say that Earth is “flat and hollow to get around this) and how an infinite plane Earth, even if it was only of a finite thickness, would still collapse into a singularity.
You should clean this up....you have some stupid arguments in here.
Don't fight stupid with stupid.
How about you provide some reasoning yourself....also you too make poor assumptions. Not as poor as the FE people but you have some serious issues.
You definitions of gravity and mass are obviously not independent.....etc...
Logically your arguments are not all true....so the entire thing is just an OR which is is not good for proofs.....
Lol.
---- let me clarify.
If you are arguing for something....you need to use those assumptions....if you are arguing against something....you have to use their assumptions.....
Got it....
You and the FE people cannot seem to separate out your assumptions.....geez
Are you physically capable of answering a single question listed here.
You can view my own criticisms in my comment history...I don't care wtf you think.
You are logically incapable of arguing in good faith....so why would I bother replying to you.
I have my own problem with FE....but you globe fanatics are just fucking as bad and ignorant....
Cool, thanks for admitting that the earth isn’t flat and that you have nothing to add here. Fuck off, you worthless well poisoning sack of shit. You won’t discredit real conspiracies with this garbage.