a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents contract law among choices. This is why the many feel in debt (contracted) to others. The few industrialized this contract law to gain control over the many as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
b) being able to perceive within perceivable implies being a partial within a whole, hence "apart" from one another. The few suggest the many e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tempting them to draw together aka "contraction".
c) living within the process of dying represents being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death); which implies the struggle to resist (living) temptation (dying). Now if one is being tempted by others into contraction (drawn together) then resistance meets resistance; hence grinding each other down through contact over apartheid.
corrupted their social values to the extent that there's almost no difference
a) once again "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one) as a suggested "norm" for behavior...following leaders; chained to commands; flowing with the mainstream; lockstep within the party-line; participating in movements; joining interest groups; nations as a label to consent to instead of as "a people" to be; repression over expression...
b) suggested SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.] - "to mix in converse; cohabitation; togetherness" tempts one to ignore perceivable apartheid; hence being partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
c) suggested values tempt one to ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable). Consenting to suggested value tempts one to ignore evaluating choice for the choices of others suggesting values...that implies self devaluation.
feeling indebted
The process of dying is impressing upon those living within. Resisting that represent the expression of growth; while ignoring to resist represents repression. Those who repress growth feel depressed by the burden of the impressing loss. The parasitic few first suggest value to gain consent by the many to repression; afterwards they rebrand the feeling of depression into "debt" to them; exponentially growing debt which mimics the ongoing process of dying.
Only self discernment gets one out of this self inflicted state of mind; which requires resisting the temptation of suggested information and the adaptation to perceivable inspiration. Every piece of suggested information one consents to uphold within ones memory, tempts one to hold onto more of it; hence increasing the burden exponentially.
Nature teaches all of this through inspiration...impression for compression to expression aka inhale (chest); compress (lung); exhale aka eat; draw nourishment; excrete etc. Hold food and drink in and notice how nature forces one to "let go"...apply this to suggested information and free your memory to allow access to perceivable inspiration.
Holding onto anything within the process of dying doesn't sustain the living...it drowns resistance needed to sustain life. Resisting grows resistance.
the atheists are almost more guilt ridden than anyone out there
That's because the believer of suggested athe-ism represent the non-believer of what all the others are believing. They didn't take a step away from suggested beliefs; they consent to not believe all of them.
Now instead of believing vs non-believing use the origin...wanting vs not wanting suggested information. That way you can see that the believers consent to want a specific belief; while the non-believers consent to not want all of the beliefs. It doesn't matter if one chooses want or not want...both sides consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
karma
Those who consent to the suggested choices of others are tempted to ignore the consequences of choices. On the other hand...those who suggest choices are tempted by all the consenting choices to feel assured...no matter the consequences.
Meanwhile for the partial (choice) within the whole (balance)...each choice has consequences for every other choice within balance, hence the need to adapt to ever changing circumstances.
a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents contract law among choices. This is why the many feel in debt (contracted) to others. The few industrialized this contract law to gain control over the many as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
b) being able to perceive within perceivable implies being a partial within a whole, hence "apart" from one another. The few suggest the many e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tempting them to draw together aka "contraction".
c) living within the process of dying represents being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death); which implies the struggle to resist (living) temptation (dying). Now if one is being tempted by others into contraction (drawn together) then resistance meets resistance; hence grinding each other down through contact over apartheid.
a) once again "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one) as a suggested "norm" for behavior...following leaders; chained to commands; flowing with the mainstream; lockstep within the party-line; participating in movements; joining interest groups; nations as a label to consent to instead of as "a people" to be; repression over expression...
b) suggested SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.] - "to mix in converse; cohabitation; togetherness" tempts one to ignore perceivable apartheid; hence being partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
c) suggested values tempt one to ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable). Consenting to suggested value tempts one to ignore evaluating choice for the choices of others suggesting values...that implies self devaluation.
The process of dying is impressing upon those living within. Resisting that represent the expression of growth; while ignoring to resist represents repression. Those who repress growth feel depressed by the burden of the impressing loss. The parasitic few first suggest value to gain consent by the many to repression; afterwards they rebrand the feeling of depression into "debt" to them; exponentially growing debt which mimics the ongoing process of dying.
Only self discernment gets one out of this self inflicted state of mind; which requires resisting the temptation of suggested information and the adaptation to perceivable inspiration. Every piece of suggested information one consents to uphold within ones memory, tempts one to hold onto more of it; hence increasing the burden exponentially.
Nature teaches all of this through inspiration...impression for compression to expression aka inhale (chest); compress (lung); exhale aka eat; draw nourishment; excrete etc. Hold food and drink in and notice how nature forces one to "let go"...apply this to suggested information and free your memory to allow access to perceivable inspiration.
Holding onto anything within the process of dying doesn't sustain the living...it drowns resistance needed to sustain life. Resisting grows resistance.
That's because the believer of suggested athe-ism represent the non-believer of what all the others are believing. They didn't take a step away from suggested beliefs; they consent to not believe all of them.
Now instead of believing vs non-believing use the origin...wanting vs not wanting suggested information. That way you can see that the believers consent to want a specific belief; while the non-believers consent to not want all of the beliefs. It doesn't matter if one chooses want or not want...both sides consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
Those who consent to the suggested choices of others are tempted to ignore the consequences of choices. On the other hand...those who suggest choices are tempted by all the consenting choices to feel assured...no matter the consequences.
Meanwhile for the partial (choice) within the whole (balance)...each choice has consequences for every other choice within balance, hence the need to adapt to ever changing circumstances.