Good point. For some reason GynaNymbaZero always has a hate-on for nuclear energy. I don't know where the user gets the idea that there are lots of nuclear energy shills.... over the past decades, the industry has been attacked, villified and greatly reduced.
Most people don't know this but Wind power is dirty. Some people more knowledgeable about physics would be better able to explain.
Essentially, Wind power is only viable due to traditional energies stabilizing the grid. Nuclear energy is very clean. As is Natural gas etc since they can very precisely dial the hertz or whatever.
Wind power adds energy in random spurts and at random speeds into the grid. This would not be viable except stable clean energies make up the majority so that the wind power hertz/amps (??) or whatever it is called goes into the pattern and rhythm of the stable energies and is absorbed like streams into a river.
I am not sure how clean hydro electrical energy is. I suspect since it is an older technology, they know how to use pressure to make a clean reliable energy that is a controlled hertz/Amp.
Solar energy can't be stored and I don't think it is clean.
Back in 2003 there was a black-out in the English-Canada (Ontario region), French- Canada (Quebec) and the US grid.
Good point. For some reason GynaNymbaZero always has a hate-on for nuclear energy. I don't know where the user gets the idea that there are lots of nuclear energy shills.... over the past decades, the industry has been attacked, villified and greatly reduced.
https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/canada-nuclear-power.aspx
https://www.opg.com/powering-ontario/our-generation/nuclear/pickering-nuclear-generation-station/
It is not the technology that is flawed, it is the management and bureaucracy.
https://www.brucepower.com/about-us/history/
Most people don't know this but Wind power is dirty. Some people more knowledgeable about physics would be better able to explain.
Essentially, Wind power is only viable due to traditional energies stabilizing the grid. Nuclear energy is very clean. As is Natural gas etc since they can very precisely dial the hertz or whatever.
Wind power adds energy in random spurts and at random speeds into the grid. This would not be viable except stable clean energies make up the majority so that the wind power hertz/amps (??) or whatever it is called goes into the pattern and rhythm of the stable energies and is absorbed like streams into a river.
I am not sure how clean hydro electrical energy is. I suspect since it is an older technology, they know how to use pressure to make a clean reliable energy that is a controlled hertz/Amp.
Solar energy can't be stored and I don't think it is clean.
Back in 2003 there was a black-out in the English-Canada (Ontario region), French- Canada (Quebec) and the US grid.
http://www.ontariotenants.ca/electricity/articles/2003/ts-03i08.phtml
The French had discreetly installed the ability to isolate themselves from the rest of the grid and leave the Anglos in the dark.
So France could have similiar plans and technology against Europeans.