I admit the word 'refusing' was a bit of a goad, but 'dave' does lay out the case for ball earth in a straightforward way. Flat earth proponents have nothing similar, not that they necessarily need to. (unless they wanted to spread their beliefs)
I'm convinced there's a thickness because I have a shovel, and have used it to penetrate the surface. Even had a well drilled at one point, so it's not like one of those simulated environments where the ground and objects only exist on the surface. The only question is how deep does it go beneath our feet. Is it miles, 7,917.5 miles, or infinitely thick?
"Space" as we've been programmed to believe, is scientifically impossible.
Is this related to that "vacuum versus atmosphere" thing? Does that make high and low pressure areas of our atmosphere also impossible? I'm not seeing a conflict.
I'm up to 5:45, where the beach chick sums up the previous minutes complaining about google victimizing flatters by postulating weakness in the globe model being the cause of over people talking about a stationary earth model.
So the first 5 minutes was crying victim. Now images of text from various flight testing/training organizations are being shown, with "lets start by assuming a flat non-rotating earth" sections being highlighted, as if it's some kind of admission. It would take a real 'beginner' to take this seriously so far. Zero science or credibility so far, unlike professor dave. Dave's a douche, but his arguments and references make flat heads explode.
I admit the word 'refusing' was a bit of a goad, but 'dave' does lay out the case for ball earth in a straightforward way. Flat earth proponents have nothing similar, not that they necessarily need to. (unless they wanted to spread their beliefs)
I'm convinced there's a thickness because I have a shovel, and have used it to penetrate the surface. Even had a well drilled at one point, so it's not like one of those simulated environments where the ground and objects only exist on the surface. The only question is how deep does it go beneath our feet. Is it miles, 7,917.5 miles, or infinitely thick?
Is this related to that "vacuum versus atmosphere" thing? Does that make high and low pressure areas of our atmosphere also impossible? I'm not seeing a conflict.
I'm up to 5:45, where the beach chick sums up the previous minutes complaining about google victimizing flatters by postulating weakness in the globe model being the cause of over people talking about a stationary earth model.
So the first 5 minutes was crying victim. Now images of text from various flight testing/training organizations are being shown, with "lets start by assuming a flat non-rotating earth" sections being highlighted, as if it's some kind of admission. It would take a real 'beginner' to take this seriously so far. Zero science or credibility so far, unlike professor dave. Dave's a douche, but his arguments and references make flat heads explode.