There are no any 4D, 3D and even 2D chess players. Only puppets that carry out plain orders of their masters with unknown real agenda.
For some unknown reasons many trying to find out some logic in some collection of events but use wrong basic data about players. Any random sequence of events could be with some effort aligned as some very wise move of one or another player. That absolutely does not mean that the player really do that. Players are dumb. No one with some ability to think by himself would be selected as "player" in current world. Only obedient puppets. It is you, who have brains to imagine 4D chess game, not them.
Even more simple - imagine, that you are looking at regular game of chess and for some unknown reason think that pawns make moves by themselves. And make a conclusion that pawns are very wise beings. They are not. They are just spineless and brainless pawns. Aligning separate pawn moves into some great pawn own strategy is a huge mistake.
We just don't know what puppet masters want to really achieve, that should be the main question.
There could be even worse thing - the masters of puppets are just insane and make absolutely senseless and random moves with their pawns. Just because they can. And than tiny small humans below spend all their efforts in cracking their heads in senseless attempts to find out nonexistent 4D chess strategies of puppets, instead of looking for masters.
There is the only way out of that clown world - identify real masters of puppets and exterminate them completely, leaving them no any possibility to somehow rise up again.
Also, there could be creating chaos and then come some Antichrist-like figure who fix things that was not broken not long ago and sheeple praise him and so on.
In any case, finding, identifying and locating those who pull the strings are more important than anything else. It does not matter what was their real plan, were they insane or not, what they want to achieve, etc if they are dead.
Hey Gyna, could you give me your deflation story/explanation for why we are going to experience deflation? I'm trying to explain to somebody but I don't quite recall your thoughts on it.
I watched this this morning, forgot to come back and reply. Interesting theory. It feels like a misunderstood concept though, where even the interviewer doesn't fully understand what he means at times, and I think it's because Jeff doesn't come right out and say it plainly, that "people are mostly viewed as worthless now because computers do more and ask for less in return."
I just finished listening to this A few minutes ago; holy shit, about 27 minutes in he starts talking about the Fed balance sheet, which at the time of this video was about 4 trillion, and he talks about how it will go to 8 trillion in the next few years… So I pull up the Fed balance sheet and it is just over 8 trillion now. When people make super accurate predictions like this you tend to listen to what they say afterwards. Everybody thinks Covid is the reason, but they were planning this.
Yeah, it's like they are trying to keep everyone content until they are ready to rip the bandaid off at full speed, once everything is at a sufficient state of disrepair and the machines / AI are fully ready, to prevent the populace from doing anything about it.
Interesting concept, the idea that things are actually getting cheaper in real terms, and only inflated because of the money trickery. Thanks for the lead (that book) and the YouTube video. I'm gonna watch that in the morning. I've always been afraid we'd go down the 90s Japan path.
CHESS; noun - "a game with different pieces on a checkered board"
CHECK; verb - "to stop; to restrain; to hinder; to curb"
BOARD, verb - "to enter a ship by force in combat"
What if living (diverse) within the process of dying (equal) represents expression of growth within ongoing loss; unless ignored for suggestions by others; which enter the vessel to cause reasoning (want vs not want aka combat) over suggested information?
GAME, noun - "amusement towards winning a stake"...what more can one gain; than what's already perceivable? What value could one win that's more valuable than evaluation?
There are no any 4D, 3D and even 2D chess players. Only puppets that carry out plain orders of their masters with unknown real agenda.
For some unknown reasons many trying to find out some logic in some collection of events but use wrong basic data about players. Any random sequence of events could be with some effort aligned as some very wise move of one or another player. That absolutely does not mean that the player really do that. Players are dumb. No one with some ability to think by himself would be selected as "player" in current world. Only obedient puppets. It is you, who have brains to imagine 4D chess game, not them.
Even more simple - imagine, that you are looking at regular game of chess and for some unknown reason think that pawns make moves by themselves. And make a conclusion that pawns are very wise beings. They are not. They are just spineless and brainless pawns. Aligning separate pawn moves into some great pawn own strategy is a huge mistake.
We just don't know what puppet masters want to really achieve, that should be the main question.
There could be even worse thing - the masters of puppets are just insane and make absolutely senseless and random moves with their pawns. Just because they can. And than tiny small humans below spend all their efforts in cracking their heads in senseless attempts to find out nonexistent 4D chess strategies of puppets, instead of looking for masters.
There is the only way out of that clown world - identify real masters of puppets and exterminate them completely, leaving them no any possibility to somehow rise up again.
Also, there could be creating chaos and then come some Antichrist-like figure who fix things that was not broken not long ago and sheeple praise him and so on.
In any case, finding, identifying and locating those who pull the strings are more important than anything else. It does not matter what was their real plan, were they insane or not, what they want to achieve, etc if they are dead.
That's a real 4.2D chess comment right there.
Theeeeyy are EEEVVERY WHHEEERREEEEeeeeee
Hey Gyna, could you give me your deflation story/explanation for why we are going to experience deflation? I'm trying to explain to somebody but I don't quite recall your thoughts on it.
I watched this this morning, forgot to come back and reply. Interesting theory. It feels like a misunderstood concept though, where even the interviewer doesn't fully understand what he means at times, and I think it's because Jeff doesn't come right out and say it plainly, that "people are mostly viewed as worthless now because computers do more and ask for less in return."
Interesting, will watch. Thanks.
I just finished listening to this A few minutes ago; holy shit, about 27 minutes in he starts talking about the Fed balance sheet, which at the time of this video was about 4 trillion, and he talks about how it will go to 8 trillion in the next few years… So I pull up the Fed balance sheet and it is just over 8 trillion now. When people make super accurate predictions like this you tend to listen to what they say afterwards. Everybody thinks Covid is the reason, but they were planning this.
Yeah, it's like they are trying to keep everyone content until they are ready to rip the bandaid off at full speed, once everything is at a sufficient state of disrepair and the machines / AI are fully ready, to prevent the populace from doing anything about it.
Interesting concept, the idea that things are actually getting cheaper in real terms, and only inflated because of the money trickery. Thanks for the lead (that book) and the YouTube video. I'm gonna watch that in the morning. I've always been afraid we'd go down the 90s Japan path.
CHESS; noun - "a game with different pieces on a checkered board"
CHECK; verb - "to stop; to restrain; to hinder; to curb"
BOARD, verb - "to enter a ship by force in combat"
What if living (diverse) within the process of dying (equal) represents expression of growth within ongoing loss; unless ignored for suggestions by others; which enter the vessel to cause reasoning (want vs not want aka combat) over suggested information?
GAME, noun - "amusement towards winning a stake"...what more can one gain; than what's already perceivable? What value could one win that's more valuable than evaluation?